Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
-51% $20.92$20.92
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
$8.77$8.77
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Books For You Today
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
God?: A Debate between a Christian and an Atheist (Point/Counterpoint) 1st Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
In God? A Debate between a Christian and an Atheist, William Lane Craig and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong bring to the printed page two debates they held before live audiences, preserving all the wit, clarity, and immediacy of their public exchanges. Avoiding overly esoteric arguments, they directly address issues such as religious experience, the Bible, evil, eternity, the origin of the universe, design, and the supposed connection between morality and the existence of God. Employing sharp and humorous arguments, each philosopher strikes quickly to the heart of his opponent's case. For example, Craig claims that we must believe in God in order to explain objective moral values, such as why rape is wrong. Sinnott-Armstrong responds that what makes rape wrong is the harm to victims of rape, so rape is immoral even if there is no God. By assuming a traditional concept of God in their discussion, the authors ensure that they are truly addressing each other's viewpoints and engaging in a disagreement over a unified issue. The book is composed of six chapters that alternate between Craig and Sinnott-Armstrong, so that each separate point can be discussed as it arises. Ideal for courses in the philosophy of religion and introduction to philosophy, this lively and direct dialogue will stimulate students and anyone interested in the existence of God, regardless of whether or not they believe in God.
- ISBN-100195166000
- ISBN-13978-0195166002
- Edition1st
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateFebruary 12, 2004
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions8.34 x 0.52 x 5.5 inches
- Print length176 pages
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Book Description
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; 1st edition (February 12, 2004)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 176 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0195166000
- ISBN-13 : 978-0195166002
- Lexile measure : 1280L
- Item Weight : 7.9 ounces
- Dimensions : 8.34 x 0.52 x 5.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,447,447 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #420 in Christianity (Books)
- #645 in Atheism (Books)
- #2,205 in Religion & Philosophy (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
William Lane Craig is Research Professor of Philosophy at Talbot School of Theology and Professor of Philosophy at Houston Baptist University. He and his wife Jan have two grown children.
At the age of sixteen as a junior in high school, he first heard the message of the Christian gospel and yielded his life to Christ. Dr. Craig pursued his undergraduate studies at Wheaton College (B.A. 1971) and graduate studies at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (M.A. 1974; M.A. 1975), the University of Birmingham (England) (Ph.D. 1977), and the University of Munich (Germany) (D.Theol. 1984). From 1980-86 he taught Philosophy of Religion at Trinity, during which time he and Jan started their family. In 1987 they moved to Brussels, Belgium, where Dr. Craig pursued research at the University of Louvain until assuming his position at Talbot in 1994.
He has authored or edited over forty books, including The Kalam Cosmological Argument; Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus; Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom; Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology; God, Time and Eternity; God ove All;andGod and Abstract Objects, as well as nearly 200 articles in professional journals of philosophy and theology, including The Journal of Philosophy, New Testament Studies, Journal for the Study of the New Testament, American Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy, and British Journal for Philosophy of Science. In 2016 Dr. Craig was named by The Best Schools as one of the fifty most influential living philosophers.
Dr. Craig's Curriculum Vitae can be read here: http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/PageServer?pagename=curriculum_vitae
Publication list: http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/PageServer?pagename=publications_main
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The first section, is where Dr. Craig proposes his reasons for faith in God. Dr. Sinnot-Armstrong gives a rebuttle and Craig rebuttles. In the section section, Dr. Sinnott-Armstrong gives an essay for atheism, Dr. Craig rebutts, and Sinnott-Armstrong rebutts.
The only real flaws in the book are that both do not really settle anything. They write past each other often enough as to not always tackel the most revelant assertions. Further, no one deals a "death-=blow" to the other. But this is telling - since debates are not where the issues always lie. Although I like philosophy and apologetics, issues of God normally are found in the lives of others.
All in all, Graig wins because his standard to achieve victory is less. He asserts that theism is reasonable. Dr. Sinnott-Armstrong could provide an adequate argument to refute the reasonableness of Dr. Graigs points. Dr. Sinnott-Armstrong's standard is much more difficult to achieve although he tries to lessen the burden by asserting he is not making "proofs in the mathmatical sense." Here he is trying to discard the "universial negative" principle. Dr. Sinnot-Armstrong also makes the general "Crusades straw-man" arguement and it backfires because Dr. Craig is able to then introduce "atheists" philosophies that killed more people and that were the logical outworkings of these belief systems.
The French mathematician Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) attempted to split the difference. He posited that if God exists we face an infinite gain (or loss) from our decision whether to believe. But on the other hand, if God doesn’t exist, the cost of living as though he did exist is small. Consequently, it makes mathematical sense to live as though one were a believer. This has come down to us as Pascal’s Wager.
This book consists of two public debates between William Lane Craig, a believer in the Christian God, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, a confirmed atheist. The format for each debate is Point, Counterpoint, Re-point, one debate starting with the premise “God exists” and the other with the premise that God doesn’t exist. This results in a total of six excellent presentations.
These thoughtful debates should appeal to (a) anyone wanting validation of their stance, (b) anyone still on the fence, and (c) anyone who simply enjoys an exercise in critical thought. It would be a stretch to say that it’s likely to change anybody’s mind as to the existence of God, but it absolutely provides food for thought.