Open Access
20 April 2023 Development of Pluoronic nanoparticles of fluorocoxib A for endoscopic fluorescence imaging of colonic adenomas
Md. Jashim Uddin, Hiroaki Niitsu, Robert J. Coffey, Lawrence J. Marnett
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Significance

Current white light colonoscopy suffers from many limitations that allow 22% to 32% of preneoplastic lesions to remain undetected. This high number of false negatives contributes to the appearance of interval malignancies, defined as neoplasms diagnosed between screening colonoscopies at a rate of 2% to 6%.

Aim

The shortcomings of today’s white light-based colorectal cancer screening are addressed by colonoscopic fluorescence imaging of preneoplastic lesions using targeted fluorescent agents to enhance contrast between the lesion and the surrounding normal colonic epithelium.

Approach

We describe the development of Pluronic® nanoparticles of fluorocoxib A (FA), a fluorescent cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor that enables targeted imaging of inflammation and cancer in numerous animal models, for endoscopic florescence imaging of colonic adenomas.

Results

We formulated FA, a fluorescent COX-2 inhibitor, or fluorocoxib negative control (FNC), a nontargeted fluorophore and a negative control for FA, in micellar nanoparticles of FDA approved Pluronic tri-block co-polymer using a bulk solvent evaporation method. This afforded FA-loaded micellar nanoparticles (FA-NPs) or FNC-loaded micellar nanoparticles (FNC-NPs) with the hydrodynamic diameters (Dh) of 45.7 ± 2.5 nm and 44.9 ± 3.8 nm and the zeta potentials (ζ) of −1.47 ± 0.3 mV and −1.64 ± 0.5 mV, respectively. We intravenously injected B6;129 mice bearing colonic adenomas induced by azoxymethane and dextran-sodium sulfate with FA-loaded Pluronic nanoparticles (FA-NPs). The diffusion-mediated local FA release and its binding to COX-2 enzyme allowed for clear detection of adenomas with high signal-to-noise ratios. The COX-2 targeted delivery and tumor retention were validated by negligible tumor fluorescence detected upon colonoscopic imaging of adenoma-bearing mice injected with Pluronic nanoparticles of FNC or of animals predosed with the COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, followed by intravenous dosing of FA-NPs.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate that the formulation of FA in Pluronic nanoparticles overcomes a significant hurdle to its clinical development for early detection of colorectal neoplasms by fluorescence endoscopy.

1.

Introduction

The enzyme, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), is overexpressed in a wide variety of malignant and premalignant neoplasms, contributing to both progression and metastasis.13 COX-2 expression has been particularly well-documented in colorectal cancer (CRC) with an average of 86% of malignancies exhibiting detectable levels of COX-2 in multiple studies.48 Among benign and premalignant colonic lesions, COX-2 expression levels range from 12.5% in hyperplastic polyps to 90% in adenomas.411 In addition, COX-2 expression increases as the lesion progresses, suggesting that it can serve as a biomarker of early CRC. Thus COX-2 is a promising target for the development of imaging agents to enable the detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the colon. To this end, we developed fluorocoxib A (FA) [Fig. 1(a)], a potent and selective fluorescent COX-2 inhibitor comprising the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug indomethacin conjugated to the fluorophore, carboxy-X-rhodamine (ROX), through a four-carbon linker.1218 We hypothesize that FA-mediated fluorescence colonoscopy will enable COX-2-targeted visualization of adenomas of the colon. In earlier preclinical studies, FA enabled visualization of a wide range of COX-2-expressing neoplasms, including intestinal polyps in ApcMin mice, 1483 human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumor xenografts in nude mice,15 nonmelanoma skin cancer in mice,14 and head-and-neck cancer and colorectal and bladder cancer in dogs.12,13 These results suggest that the clinical development of FA has the potential to substantially improve the early detection of neoplasms including CRC. However, development has been hampered by FA’s lack of aqueous solubility. To address this issue, we now report the Pluronic® formulation of FA and describe its utility in COX-2-targeted colonoscopic optical imaging of azoxymethane/dextran sodium sulfate (AOM/DSS)-induced adenomas of the colon in B6;129 mice.

Fig. 1

(a) Chemical structure of FA and FNC. (b) Pluronic F127 polymeric micellar nanoparticle formulation of FA or FNC in CHCl3 and DPBS following gentle stirring at 25°C for 16 h in the dark.

JBO_28_4_040501_f001.png

2.

Materials and Methods

Previously, FA has been solubilized using solvent systems that are not approved by the FDA for clinical applications.15,19 Thus we selected Pluronic, an FDA-approved organic nonionic triblock copolymer, consisting of a central hydrophobic block of polypropylene glycol (PPG) edged by two hydrophilic blocks of polyethylene glycol (PEG), for the formulation of FA. Pluronic polymer self-assembles into micellar nanoparticles in aqueous systems, enabling solubilization of hydrophobic organic compounds, such as FA, by encapsulating them inside the hydrophobic core surrounded by the hydrated corona.

2.1.

Pluronic F127 Polymeric Micellar Nanoparticles

We encapsulated FA into Pluronic F127 (PEG101-PPG56-PEG101, also known as Poloxamer 407) polymeric micelles by a bulk solvent evaporation method.18 In this method, FA and Pluronic F127 polymer were first dissolved individually in chloroform. Then the FA (25 mL, 20 mg/mL) solution was added to the Pluronic (25 mL, 200 mg/mL) solution, and the resultant solution was added dropwise to 1 mL of Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS pH 7.0 to 7.3, without calcium and magnesium) at 25°C with gentle stirring. The binary system was stirred for 16 h at 25°C in the dark, during which time the chloroform was evaporated. Sterile centrifugation of the formulation afforded FA-loaded Pluronic micellar nanoparticles (FA-NPs) ready to administer for colonoscopic fluorescence imaging of adenomas of the colon. As a negative control, we used fluorocoxib negative control [FNC, Fig. 1(a)] for fluorescence colonoscopy because it lacks the ability to inhibit COX-2 in both purified enzyme and cell-based assays.15 The FNC was encapsulated in Pluronic F127 [Fig. 1(b)] micelles using a bulk solvent evaporation method identical to that used for the FA formulation described above. This afforded FNC-loaded Pluronic micellar nanoparticles (FNC-NPs).

2.2.

Concentration of FA in Pluronic Micellar Nanoparticles Solution

We measured the concentration of FA-encapsulated Pluronic micellar nanoparticles (FA-NPs) solution by adding dimethylformamide (DMF, 0.1 mL) to FA-NPs solution (0.1 mL). We stirred the mixture for 16 h at 25°C to release FA from the nanoparticles. This was performed in triplicate. Then we measured the fluorescence intensity of each test sample at 605 nm emission (excitation at 581 nm) on a TECAN Infinite M1000Pro Micro-Plate Reader, from which we calculated the concentration of FA in each test sample by comparing the fluorescence intensity values with a standard curve of FA (λex: 581 nm, λem: 605 nm) dissolved in 50/50 DMF/DPBS. This afforded the FA concentration to be 0.231 mg/mL in FA-NPs solution.

2.3.

Photophysical and Physicochemical Properties of Pluronic F127 Micellar Nanoparticles

We determined the photophysical properties of Pluronic F127 micellar nanoparticles on a Spex 1681 Fluorolog Spectrofluorometer containing a 450-W Xenon Arc Lamp. Using a previously described procedure,20 we recorded the excitation and emission spectra of both FA-NPs and FNC-NPs at a 0.05 AU/cm optical density measured in 10×4  mm cuvettes (FA-NPs, λex at 581 nm and λem at 605 nm and FNC-NPs, λex at 581 nm and λem at 606 nm). We used a Malvern Zetasizer Nano-ZS Instrument, equipped with a 4-mW Helium Neon Laser operating at 632.8 nm to measure the hydrodynamic diameter (Dh) and zeta potential (ζ) of the nanoparticles. In both cases, the samples were prepared by passing the micelles dissolved in 1 mL of DPBS without calcium and magnesium (pH 7.3) through a 0.45-μm syringe filter.

2.4.

Animal Model of Colorectal Adenoma

We used a colorectal adenoma mouse model21 in a mixed C57BL/6J and 129S1/SvlmJ background, named B6;129 mice. We housed and treated all mice according to a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center. We treated 8-week-old wild-type B6;129 mice with two 10 mg/kg intraperitoneal doses of azoxymethane (AOM; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) in 2 consecutive days (1 dose/day) followed by free drinking of sterile deionized water containing 2% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS; #DS1044, Gojira Fine Chemicals, Ohio, United States) for 5 days. After completion of DSS administration, the mice were allowed to drink distilled water for 8 to 10 weeks. In this model, colorectal adenomas begin to appear at the distal colon 8 weeks after AOM injection, which is a substantially shorter latency time for tumor development than that of the classical colonic tumorigenesis model induced by AOM alone.22 Morphologically these mouse adenomas are similar to human colonic tumors.23,24

2.5.

Veterinary Endoscopy System

We used a Karl Storz-Endoskope System (Karl Storz, Germany) for fluorescence colonoscopy of B6;129 mice bearing colonic adenomas. Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (Piramal Critical Care, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States). The endoscopy system was configured with a rigid telescope. The dimension of the telescope was 1.9  mm×10  cm with a 30-deg field of amplification. The telescope was connected to a Tricam camera and a modified D-light source with RFP/mCherry filter sets for simultaneous fluorescence and white-light colonoscopic in vivo imaging.

2.6.

In Vivo Endoscopic Fluorescence Imaging and Validation

B6;129 mice (4 animals/group) bearing AOM/DSS-induced colorectal adenomas were administered with FA-NPs (0.5 mg/kg) or FNC-NPs (0.5 mg/kg) via tail vein injection. In COX-2 blocking control experiments, mice received FA-NPs (0.5 mg/kg) 1 h after an intraperitoneal injection of celecoxib (10 mg/kg) to block binding of FA to the COX-2 active site. Endoscopic fluorescence imaging experiments were performed at 1-h postinjection of FA-NPs, celecoxib/FA-NPs or FNC-NPs using a Karl Storz-Endoskope System. We recorded videos and captured static images of colonic adenomas and surrounding normal colon epithelium during the fluorescence colonoscopy.

2.7.

Quantification of Fluorescence Intensity

Following endoscopic imaging of all four groups of animals (n=4 animals/group), the captured static images were analyzed. It should be noted that, among the test or control group of animals, each mouse possessed one tumor (n=4 tumors/group). We created regions of interest (ROIs) within the colonic adenomas or surrounding normal colon epithelium and measured the fluorescence intensity within these ROIs using ImageJ software.

2.8.

Determination of Signal-to-Background Ratio

We measured the signal-to-background ratio (SBR) by dividing the mean fluorescence intensity of colonic adenomas (6.72×109, n=4 tumors) with the mean fluorescence intensity of surrounding normal colon epithelium (2.31×108, n=4 normal tissues) within the respective ROIs measured in photons/s using ImageJ software.

2.9.

Statistical Methods

For statistical analyses of acquired data, we used student’s t-test to compare fluorescence signal intensities between colonic tumors with surrounding normal colon epithelium. We set the statistical significance at P0.05, where the data were used as the arithmetic mean and standard error within the size of the samples (n).

3.

Results and Discussion

We formulated and determined the photophysical properties of FA-NPs and FNC-NPs in aqueous solutions that resulted in complete retention of excitation and emission maxima of FA and FNC. FNC is an analog of FA with a tether between the indomethacin and ROX moieties that is 2-carbons long rather than the 4-carbon tether in FA. This shorter tether renders FNC unable to inhibit COX-2. In addition, we determined the physicochemical properties including hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potentials. The data showed that the hydrodynamic diameter (Dh) of FA-NPs and FNC-NPs were 45.7±2.5  nm and 44.9±3.8  nm, respectively, and the zeta potentials (ζ) were 1.47±0.3  mV and 1.64±0.5  mV, respectively. These results suggest that both FA-NPs and FNC-NPs exhibit properties reported to be favorable for tissue penetration and cellular internalization in living animals.18

We used a colorectal adenoma mouse model21 in B6;129 mice by treating them with AOM followed by DSS. In this model, adenomas are typically observed at 8 weeks after AOM administration. The tumors appeared to be predominantly oval with an average length of 1 to 2 mm and width of 0.5 to 1.0 mm.

FA-NP or FNC-NP was injected intravenously and 1 h later mice were lightly anesthetized with 2% isoflurane, and fluorescence colonoscopy was performed using a Karl Storz Veterinary Colonoscope. The delivery of FA-NPs followed by the release of FA resulted in a high adenoma fluorescence compared with that of the surrounding normal colon tissues [Fig. 2(a), Figs. S1 and S2 in the Supplementary Material]. The SBRs were >29 (n=4, p<0.0001). In contrast, minimal fluorescence of adenomas was detected at 1 h postdosing of FNC-NPs in tumor-bearing mice. Similarly, minimal fluorescence was observed in animals treated with the COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, before administration of FA-NP [Fig. 2(a)]. We used ImageJ software for postacquisition image analysis [Fig. 2(b)]. The expression of COX-2 in the tumor tissues was confirmed by immunohistological analysis [Fig. 2(c)]. Histologically, the tumors were well-differentiated adenomas. Of interest, the COX-2 immunoreactivity was confined to the stroma of the adenoma, and staining was not observed in the normal colon. These results confirm that the FA delivery and tumor retention occurred by a COX-2-dependent mechanism.

Fig. 2

(a) Representative white light and corresponding fluorescence colonoscopy images (static) of B6;129 mice bearing either colorectal adenomas or normal colon injected with Pluronic micellar nanoparticles of fluorocoxib A (FA-NPs, 0.5 mg/kg) or Pluronic micellar nanoparticles of fluorocoxib negative control (FNC-NPs, 0.5 mg/kg) via tail vein injections. In the COX-2 blocking control experiment, tumor bearing B6;129 mice received FA-NPs (0.5 mg/kg) 1 h after an intraperitoneal injection of celecoxib (10 mg/kg) to block binding of FA to the COX-2 active site. (b) ImageJ software was used for quantification of fluorescence intensity at the ROI of colonic adenomas versus adjacent normal colon epithelium (N.S., not significant). (c) COX-2 immunohistochemical staining of well-differentiated adenoma and adjacent normal colon (Video 1, MOV, 31.9 MB [URL: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.28.4.040501.s1]).

JBO_28_4_040501_f002.png

White light colonoscopy has revolutionized our understanding and ability to characterize colorectal neoplasms in appreciable detail. It also provides a highly effective means to screen, diagnose, and treat preneoplastic and neoplastic colonic lesions. It has been hypothesized that fluorescence colonoscopy using a specific probe targeted to a CRC biomarker can improve the detection of preneoplastic colonic lesions. Past efforts to test this hypothesis have included the development of optical imaging agents targeted to a range of CRC biomarkers.25 Currently, peptide-based compounds26 and antibody-based agents27 are still at the preclinical stages. The present studies with targeted nanoparticles set the framework for endoscopic molecular imaging of COX-2 as a biomarker of CRC in animal models and will facilitate the development of this nanotechnology for early detection colorectal neoplasm in patients.

4.

Conclusions

In this letter, we described FA-NPs, Pluronic polymer-based micellar nanoparticles of FA, and demonstrated their COX-2-dependent delivery of FA to colonic neoplasms, thereby enabling FA-mediated colonoscopic optical imaging of adenomas in AOM/DSS-treated B6;129 mice. The COX-2-dependent delivery of FA within the colorectal adenomas was confirmed by the presence of very low fluorescence signal in adenomas from animals injected with nontargeted FNC-NPs or animals treated with celecoxib prior to injection with FA-NPs. This study establishes a framework for clinical development/deployment of FA-NPs for colonoscopic fluorescence imaging of COX-2 as a biomarker for the early detection of colorectal cancer.

Disclosures

We declare that we have an issued patent (US 8,865,130 B2 2014) for the use of FA in early detection of colonic tumors.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the National Institutes of Health (Grant No. R01 CA89450 to L.J.M.) and the Phi Beta Psi Sorority Charity Trust (Grant No. AWD00000652 to M.J.U.) for financial support, the Vanderbilt Institute of Nanoscale Science and Engineering Core Laboratory for assistance with the determination of properties of the developed nanoparticles, and Dr. Carol A. Rouzer for critical reading and editing of the manuscript. R.J.C was supported by the National Cancer Institute (Grant Nos. NCI R35 CA197570, UG3 241685, P01 CA229123, and P50 236733). R.J.C. would like to acknowledge the generous support of the Nicholas Tierney GI Cancer Memorial Fund.

References

1. 

W. L. Smith, R. M. Garavito and D. L. DeWitt, “Prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthases (cyclooxygenases)-1 and -2,” J. Biol. Chem., 271 (52), 33157 –33160 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.52.33157 JBCHA3 0021-9258 (1996). Google Scholar

2. 

R. E. Harris, “Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and the inflammogenesis of cancer,” Subcell Biochem., 42 93 –126 https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5688-5_4 (2007). Google Scholar

3. 

N. Hashemi Goradel et al., “Cyclooxygenase-2 in cancer: a review,” J. Cell Physiol., 234 (5), 5683 –5699 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.27411 (2018). Google Scholar

4. 

C. E. Eberhart et al., “Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene expression in human colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas,” Gastroenterology, 107 (4), 1183 –1188 https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(94)90246-1 GASTAB 0016-5085 (1994). Google Scholar

5. 

D. J. Elder et al., “Human colorectal adenomas demonstrate a size-dependent increase in epithelial cyclooxygenase-2 expression,” J. Pathol., 198 (4), 428 –434 https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1232 (2002). Google Scholar

6. 

S. L. Kargman et al., “Expression of prostaglandin G/H synthase-1 and -2 protein in human colon cancer,” Cancer Res., 55 (12), 2556 –2559 CNREA8 0008-5472 (1995). Google Scholar

7. 

T. Kawasaki et al., “Cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression is common in serrated and non-serrated colorectal adenoma, but uncommon in hyperplastic polyp and sessile serrated polyp/adenoma,” BMC Cancer, 8 33 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-33 BCMACL 1471-2407 (2008). Google Scholar

8. 

M. Maekawa et al., “Increased expression of cyclooxygenase-2 to -1 in human colorectal cancers and adenomas, but not in hyperplastic polyps,” Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., 28 (7), 421 –426 https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/28.7.421 (1998). Google Scholar

9. 

H. Bamba et al., “High expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in macrophages of human colonic adenoma,” Int. J. Cancer, 83 (4), 470 –475 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19991112)83:4<470::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO;2-F IJCNAW 1097-0215 (1999). Google Scholar

10. 

K. S. Chapple et al., “Localization of cyclooxygenase-2 in human sporadic colorectal adenomas,” Am. J. Pathol., 156 (2), 545 –553 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64759-1 AJPAA4 0002-9440 (2000). Google Scholar

11. 

X. Hao et al., “Early expression of cyclo-oxygenase-2 during sporadic colorectal carcinogenesis,” J. Pathol., 187 (3), 295 –301 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199902)187:3<295::AID-PATH254>3.0.CO;2-Y (1999). Google Scholar

12. 

M. Cekanova et al., “Molecular imaging of cyclooxygenase-2 in canine transitional cell carcinomas in vitro and in vivo,” Cancer Prev. Res., 6 (5), 466 –476 https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0358 (2013). Google Scholar

13. 

M. Cekanova et al., “Single-dose safety and pharmacokinetic evaluation of fluorocoxib A: pilot study of novel cyclooxygenase-2-targeted optical imaging agent in a canine model,” J. Biomed. Opt., 17 (11), 116002 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.11.116002 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2012). Google Scholar

14. 

H. Ra et al., “Detection of non-melanoma skin cancer by in vivo fluorescence imaging with fluorocoxib A,” Neoplasia, 17 (2), 201 –207 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2014.12.009 (2015). Google Scholar

15. 

M. J. Uddin et al., “Selective visualization of cyclooxygenase-2 in inflammation and cancer by targeted fluorescent imaging agents,” Cancer Res., 70 (9), 3618 –3627 https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2664 CNREA8 0008-5472 (2010). Google Scholar

16. 

M. J. Uddin et al., “Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationship studies of fluorescent inhibitors of cycloxygenase-2 as targeted optical imaging agents,” Bioconjug. Chem., 24 (4), 712 –723 https://doi.org/10.1021/bc300693w BCCHES 1043-1802 (2013). Google Scholar

17. 

M. J. Uddin et al., “Fluorocoxib A enables targeted detection of cyclooxygenase-2 in laser-induced choroidal neovascularization,” J. Biomed. Opt., 21 (9), 090503 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.090503 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2016). Google Scholar

18. 

M. J. Uddin et al., “Fluorocoxib A loaded nanoparticles enable targeted visualization of cyclooxygenase-2 in inflammation and cancer,” Biomaterials, 92 71 –80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.028 BIMADU 0142-9612 (2016). Google Scholar

19. 

J. V. Roughan, H. G. Bertrand and H. M. Isles, “Meloxicam prevents COX-2-mediated post-surgical inflammation but not pain following laparotomy in mice,” Eur. J. Pain, 20 (2), 231 –240 https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.712 (2016). Google Scholar

20. 

J. O. McIntyre et al., “Development of a novel fluorogenic proteolytic beacon for in vivo detection and imaging of tumour-associated matrix metalloproteinase-7 activity,” Biochem. J., 377 (3), 617 –628 https://doi.org/10.1042/bj20030582 (2004). Google Scholar

21. 

P. N. Vega et al., “Cancer-associated fibroblasts and squamous epithelial cells constitute a unique microenvironment in a mouse model of inflammation-induced colon cancer,” Front. Oncol., 12 878920 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.878920 FRTOA7 0071-9676 (2022). Google Scholar

22. 

M. De Robertis et al., “The AOM/DSS murine model for the study of colon carcinogenesis: from pathways to diagnosis and therapy studies,” J. Carcinog., 10 9 https://doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.78279 (2011). Google Scholar

23. 

Q. Pan et al., “Genomic variants in mouse model induced by azoxymethane and dextran sodium sulfate improperly mimic human colorectal cancer,” Sci. Rep., 7 25 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00057-3 SRCEC3 2045-2322 (2017). Google Scholar

24. 

R. Suzuki et al., “Sequential observations on the occurrence of preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions in mouse colon treated with azoxymethane and dextran sodium sulfate,” Cancer Sci., 95 (9), 721 –727 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb03252.x (2004). Google Scholar

25. 

T. K. Nikolouzakis et al., “Improving diagnosis, prognosis and prediction by using biomarkers in CRC patients (Review),” Oncol. Rep., 39 (6), 2455 –2472 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6330 OCRPEW 1021-335X (2018). Google Scholar

26. 

J. Burggraaf et al., “Detection of colorectal polyps in humans using an intravenously administered fluorescent peptide targeted against c-Met,” Nat. Med., 21 (8), 955 –961 https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3641 1078-8956 (2015). Google Scholar

27. 

J. Kim et al., “Molecular imaging of colorectal tumors by targeting colon cancer secreted protein-2 (CCSP-2),” Neoplasia, 19 (10), 805 –816 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2017.07.003 (2017). Google Scholar
CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Md. Jashim Uddin, Hiroaki Niitsu, Robert J. Coffey, and Lawrence J. Marnett "Development of Pluoronic nanoparticles of fluorocoxib A for endoscopic fluorescence imaging of colonic adenomas," Journal of Biomedical Optics 28(4), 040501 (20 April 2023). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.28.4.040501
Received: 12 January 2023; Accepted: 30 March 2023; Published: 20 April 2023
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Nanoparticles

Endoscopy

Fluorescence

Fluorescence imaging

Tumors

Colon

Animals

Back to Top