Background: Psychedelic-assisted therapies (PAT) are emerging as a promising treatment for psycho-existential distress in patients with serious illness. A recent qualitative analysis of perspectives of 17 experts in serious illness care and/or PAT research identified divergent views on the therapeutic potential and safety of PAT in patients with serious illness. This paper further analyzes the factors that may influence these views.
Objectives: To identify factors underlying the attitudes of experts in serious illness care and/or PAT toward PAT and its potential role in serious illness care.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews of 17 experts in serious illness care and/or PAT from the United States and Canada were analyzed to identify factors cited as influencing their views on PAT.
Results: Five factors were identified as influencing experts' attitudes toward PAT: perception of unmet need, knowledge of empirical studies of PAT, personal experience with psychedelics, professional background, and age/generation. In addition, an integrative theme emerged from the analysis, namely PAT's disruptive potential at 4 levels relevant to serious illness care: patient's experience of self, illness, and death; relationships with loved ones and health-care providers; existing clinical models of serious illness care; and societal attitudes toward death. Whether this disruptive potential was viewed as a therapeutic opportunity, or an undue risk, was central in influencing experts' level of support. Experts' perception of this disruptive potential was directly influenced by the 5 identified factors.
Significance of results: Points of disruption potentially invoked by PAT in serious illness care highlight important practical and philosophical considerations when working to integrate PAT into serious illness care delivery in a safe and effective way.
Keywords: Disruption; Psychedelic-assisted therapy; Qualitative research; Serious illness care.