Advertisement
Advertisement
US-China relations
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
The US has prioritised measures to prevent China from gaining a technological edge, including restrictions on the export of advanced technology. Photo illustration: Reuters

China’s adoption of AI isn’t as great as Washington fears, analysts tell US lawmakers

  • Censorship imposed by Beijing keeps AI developers in China at a disadvantage, experts say
  • US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo says ‘I know that we are vulnerable’ because the US still is not able to manufacture leading-edge chips ‘at scale’

US analysts are overestimating China’s ability to deploy artificial intelligence, lawmakers assessing national security threats from AI advances were told on Tuesday.

“How is China actually adopting other information and communications technologies at scale?” George Washington University political scientist Jeffrey Ding said in testimony before the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. “What are its adoption rates and cloud computing, industrial software [and] related technologies that would all be in a similar category to AI, and those rates lag far behind the US.”

The White House and US lawmakers have prioritised measures to prevent China from gaining a technological edge, starting with restrictions on the export of advanced semiconductor chips and other advanced technology.

US lawmaker calls for end to all tech exports to Huawei, SMIC

Those restrictions – imposed on Huawei Technologies and other Chinese companies – first went into effect in 2019, when former president Donald Trump was in office, as the US government began trying to halt the flow of technologies to China that could be used for advanced military applications.

Huawei’s ability to work around Washington’s efforts surfaced in a separate congressional hearing with Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo on Tuesday.

Under questioning by members of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee about a newly issued Huawei phone, Raimondo said the product did not prove that China had acquired the ability to produce advanced chips “at scale”.
US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo testifies before the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology on Tuesday. Photo; Getty Images via AFP

“We don’t have any evidence that they can manufacture seven nanometre [chips] at scale,” she said. “I know that we are vulnerable. We buy all of those chips you’re talking about, the AI chips, the leading-edge chips, all of that, none of them are made in America right now, which is why I’ve got to work like crazy every day to bring that manufacturing home.”

Congress has forged ahead with bills aimed at building an advanced chip production industry in the US, in particular the Chips and Science Act, which was the subject of the House hearing.

President Joe Biden announced plans to restrict US venture capital and private equity investments in Chinese companies in three areas: semiconductors and micro electronics, quantum information technologies and “certain artificial intelligence systems”.
George Washington University political scientist Jeffrey Ding speaks to the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on Tuesday.

However, Ding and Benjamin Jensen, a professor at Marine Corps University School of Advanced Warfighting – another witness at Tuesday’s hearing – identified several weaknesses inhibiting China’s ability to deploy AI.

“On benchmarks and leader boards, where US models are compared to Chinese models on Chinese language prompts, models like ChatGPT still perform better than Chinese counterparts,” Ding said. “Some of these bottlenecks relate to a reliance on Western companies to open up new paradigms, China’s censorship regime … and computing power bottlenecks.”

Highlighting the extent to which information is censored in China, Jensen said an “adherence to socialist thought in data sets” keeps AI developers there at a disadvantage.

“These regimes are afraid to have the type of open, honest dialogue this committee is promoting, and that fear is our opportunity,” he said.

Additional reporting by Bochen Han

4