Abstract
The relationship between ethics education and recent scholarship on social responsibility is crucial to explore. At times, ethics education has been designed to focus narrowly on compliance with rules and regulations. In contrast, other forms of ethics education emphasize direct attention to social responsibility and the types of obligations that future professionals have to society. In this chapter, we provide an overview of social responsibility, including some of its intellectual foundations, and discuss an important distinction to the realm of ethics education between personal and professional social responsibility. We also review some of the current social responsibility literature and describe connections between social responsibility and traditional approaches to ethics education. We conclude by highlighting opportunities for future research in the realm of social responsibility, including lessons learned from our own research. In particular, there is a need for further analysis of the long-term development of student social responsibility attitudes and their impact on professional practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Project details, publications, and research tools are available at: https://serve-learn-sustain.gatech.edu/institutional-transformation-project
- 2.
For more information about Serve-Learn-Sustain at Georgia Tech, refer to: https://sls.gatech.edu/
Bibliography
Adamson, Greg, and Joseph Herkert. 2022. Addressing intelligent systems and ethical design in the IEEE code of ethics. In Codes of ethics and ethical guidelines, ed. Kelly Laas, Michael Davis, and Elisabeth Hildt, 145–159. Springer.
Allyn, Bobby. 2022, January 12. Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes to be sentenced on Sept. 26. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2022/01/12/1072612059/former-theranos-ceo-elizabeth-holmes-to-be-sentenced-on-sept-26.
Bandura, Albert. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84 (2): 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
Bebeau, Muriel J., James R. Rest, and Darcia Narvaez. 1999. Beyond the promise: A perspective on research in moral education. Educational Researcher 28 (4): 18–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028004018.
Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity.
Bielefeldt, Angela R. 2021. Intersectional complexities of race/ethnicity and gender in engineering students’ professional social responsibility attitudes. In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.
Bielefeldt, Angela R., and Nathan E. Canney. 2016a. Changes in the social responsibility attitudes of engineering students over time. Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5): 1535–1551.
———. 2016b. Relationships between religion, spirituality, and socially responsible engineering. Engineering Studies 8 (1): 66–90.
Bird, Stephanie J. 2014. Social responsibility and research ethics: Not either/or but both. Professional Ethics Report 27 (2): 1–4.
Bobo, Lawrence. 1991. Social responsibility, individualism, and redistributive policies. Sociological Forum 6: 71–92.
Canney, Nathan E., and Angela Bielefeldt. 2015a. A framework for the development of social responsibility in engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education 31 (1B): 414–424.
———. 2015b. Differences in engineering students’ views of social responsibility between disciplines. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 141 (4): 04015004.
———. 2015c. Gender differences in the social responsibility attitudes of engineering students and how they change over time. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 21 (3).
———. 2016. Validity and reliability evidence of the engineering professional responsibility assessment tool. Journal of Engineering Education 105 (3): 452–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20124.
Cech, Erin A. 2014. Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology, & Human Values 39 (1): 42–72.
Cetina, Karin Knorr. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Delve, Cecilia I., Suzanne D. Mintz, and Greig M. Stewart. 1990. Promoting values development through community service: A design. New Directions for Student Services 1990 (50): 7–29.
Dolan, Deanne Dunbar, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, and Mildred K. Cho. 2022. Three decades of ethical, legal, and social implications research: Looking back to chart a path forward. Cell Genomics: 100150.
Eosco, Gina M., Meghnaa Tallapragada, Katherine A. McComas, and Merrill Brady. 2014. Exploring societal and ethical views of nanotechnology REUs. NanoEthics 8 (1): 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-014-0192-z.
Erwin, Alexandra, Jason Borenstein, Wendy Newstetter, Colin Potts, and Ellen Zegura. 2018. Undergraduate STEM students and community engagement activities: initial findings from an assessment of their concern for public well-being. In ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2018.
Friedman, Marilyn. 1991. The practice of partiality. Ethics 101 (4): 818–835.
Gangone, Lynn M. 2022. Educators and social responsibility: What this means to informed citizenry. Washington, DC: AACTE.
Gilligan, Carol. 1993. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gotterbarn, D.W., Bo Brinkman, Catherine Flick, Michael S. Kirkpatrick, Keith Miller, Kate Vazansky, and Marty J. Wolf. 2018. ACM code of ethics and professional conduct. Association for Computing Machinery.
Gough, Harrison G., Herbert McClosky, and Paul E. Meehl. 1952. A personality scale for social responsibility. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 47 (1): 73.
Greene, Joshua. 2014. Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. Penguin.
Grosz, Barbara J., David Gray Grant, Kate Vredenburgh, Jeff Behrends, Hu Lily, Alison Simmons, and Jim Waldo. 2019. Embedded EthiCS: Integrating ethics across CS education. Communications of the ACM 62 (8): 54–61.
Harris, Charles E. 2013. Engineering ethics: From preventive ethics to aspirational ethics. In Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process, ed. Diane P. Michelfelder, Natasha McCarthy, and David E. Goldberg, 177–187. Dordrecht: Springer.
Herkert, Joseph R. 2005. Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3): 373–385.
Herkert, Joseph R., Jason Borenstein, and Keith Miller. 2020. The Boeing 737 MAX: Lessons for engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6): 2957–2974.
Hess, Justin L., and Grant Fore. 2018. A systematic literature review of US engineering ethics interventions. Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2): 551–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6.
Huff, Chuck, and Laura Barnard. 2009. Good computing. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 28 (3): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2009.934158.
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 2020. IEEE code of ethics. Piscataway.
Jaggar, Alison M. 1995. Caring as a feminist practice of moral reason. In Justice and care. Routledge.
Kennedy, Brian, Alec Tyson, and Cary Funk. 2022. Americans’ trust in scientists, other groups declines. Pew Research Center, 15 Feb 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/02/15/americans-trust-in-scientists-other-groups-declines/
Kreth, Quintin, Daniel S. Schiff, Jeonghyun Lee, Jason Borenstein, and Ellen Zegura. 2022. Social responsibility attitudes among undergraduate computer science students: An empirical analysis. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference Minneapolis.
Lidow, Derek. 2019. Mark Zuckerberg and the tech world still do not understand ethics. Forbes, 11 Mar 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereklidow/2019/03/11/mark-zuckerberg-and-the-tech-world-still-do-not-understand-ethics/?sh=4305db035386
Martin, Diana Adela, Eddie Conlon, and Brian Bowe. 2021. A multi-level review of engineering ethics education: Towards a socio-technical orientation of engineering education for ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (5): 1–38.
Morrow, David R. 2014. When technologies makes good people do bad things: Another argument against the value-neutrality of technologies. Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2): 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9464-1.
Mozilla Foundation. 2017. Responsible computer science challenge. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/what-we-fund/awards/responsible-computer-science-challenge/
Narvaez, Darcia. 2005. The Neo-Kohlbergian Tradition and beyond: Schemas, expertise, and character. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 51: 119–163.
Narvaez, Darcia, and James Rest. 1995. The four components of acting morally. Moral Behavior and Moral Development: An Introduction 1 (1): 385–400.
National Academy of Engineering. 2009. Ethics education and scientific and engineering research: What’s been learned? What should be done? Summary of a workshop. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
National Academy of Engineering, Infusing Ethics Selection Committee. 2016. Infusing ethics into the development of engineers: Exemplary education and programs. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Olney, C., and S. Grande. 1995. Validation of a scale to measure development of social responsibility. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 2 (1) http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.0002.104.
Patel, Prachi. 2015. Engineers, ethics, and the VW scandal. IEEE Spectrum 25.
Pettit, Philip. 2000. Non-consequentialism and universalizability. The Philosophical Quarterly 50 (199): 175–190.
Pritchard, Michael S., and Michael S. Pritchard. 2006. Professional integrity: Thinking ethically. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Ramsey, John. 1989. A curricular framework for community-based STS issue instruction. Education and Urban Society 22 (1): 40–53.
———. 1993. The science education reform movement: Implications for social responsibility. Science Education 77 (2): 235–258.
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schiff, Daniel S., Emma Logevall, Jason Borenstein, Wendy Newstetter, Colin Potts, and Ellen Zegura. 2021. Linking personal and professional social responsibility development to microethics and macroethics: Observations from early undergraduate education. Journal of Engineering Education 110 (1): 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20371.
Schwartz, Shalom H. 1977. Normative influences on altruism. In Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 10, 221–279. London: Elsevier.
Schwartz, Shalom H., and Judith A. Howard. 1982. Helping and cooperation: A self-based motivational model. In Cooperation and helping behavior, 327–353. London: Elsevier.
Singer, Peter. 1981. The concept of moral standing. In Ethics in hard times, The Hastings Center series in ethics, ed. Arthur L. Caplan and Daniel Callahan, 31–45. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4022-5_2.
Skorupski, John. 1995. Agent-neutrality, consequentialism, utilitarianism… a terminological note. Utilitas 7 (1): 49–54.
Toh, Michelle. 2021. Facebook sued for $150 billion over violence against Rohingya in Myanmar. CNN Business, 7 Dec 2021. https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/07/tech/facebook-myanmar-rohingya-muslims-intl-hnk/index.html.
United Nations. 2021. SDGs Youth Leadership and Social Responsibility Education. Accessed September 14, 2022. https://sdgs.un.org/partnerships/sdgs-youth-leadership-and-social-responsibility-education-0.
Ward, Kelly, and Lisa Wolf-Wendel. 2000. Community-Centered service learning: Moving from doing for to doing with. American Behavioral Scientist 43 (5): 767–780.
Wittig, Ann. 2013. Implementing problem based learning through engineers without Borders student projects. Advances in Engineering Education 3 (4): n4.
Wray-Lake, Laura, and Amy K. Syvertsen. 2011. The developmental roots of social responsibility in childhood and adolescence. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 2011 (134): 11–25.
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2023. The age of surveillance capitalism. In Social theory re-wired, 203–213. Routledge.
Acknowledgements
This chapter is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation Cultivating Cultures for Ethical STEM Program (Award #1635554). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kreth, Q., Schiff, D.S., Lee, J., Borenstein, J., Zegura, E. (2024). Social Responsibility and Ethics in STEM Education: The State of the Field. In: Hildt, E., Laas, K., Brey, E.M., Miller, C.Z. (eds) Building Inclusive Ethical Cultures in STEM. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51560-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51560-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51559-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51560-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)