
Tribunal sets aside debarment, citing inadequate notification
The FSP used an email address it obtained from a credit bureau, but the rep denied this address belonged to her.
The FSP used an email address it obtained from a credit bureau, but the rep denied this address belonged to her.
The case highlights that debarment is reserved for instances of clear, intentional breaches of integrity, not mere negligence.
The Tribunal finds the FSP skipped critical steps, including notifying the representative and giving her an opportunity to respond.
The decisions show that even thwarted attempts to breach confidentiality signal a critical lapse in integrity.
Despite a 20-year debarment, a R143m fine, and even losing a leg in a motorcycle accident, Cobus Geldenhuis is allegedly still defrauding investors under a new alias.
Mareo Nel resumed unauthorised forex trading despite signing an enforceable undertaking in 2021.
The Tribunal’s ruling highlights that following the correct process is as important as addressing misconduct in the financial services sector.
The High Court rules on a former employee’s contention that the FSP’s notice of intention to debar was a breach of their settlement agreement.
The former owner of Gundo Wealth Solutions has been fined R3 million and debarred for a decade for brokering investments into VBS Mutual Bank.
The Authority has agreed to reconsider the penalties it imposed on ‘Coenie’ Botha, the founder of Coin Based Innovation Global.
Craig Warriner’s confession to orchestrating a massive Ponzi scheme has led to 30-year bans for Global & Local’s Michael Haldane and Mauro Forlin.
The FSCA levied a R100 000 penalty on Wenru, the financial services provider implicated in the case.
SASTUA says the former key individual issued policies under false pretences and submitted duplicate claims for the same items.
Commercial insurance agent who was debarred for diverting premiums to her bank account asks to be allowed to make a fresh start.
The representative’s conduct of completing contracts as new instead of replacements was not motivated by dishonesty, the FST says.
The former Old Mutual adviser claimed the complainants were not his clients but his relatives who had agreed to lend him the money.
The FST finds that the FSP’s attempt to use debarment as a tool to resolve an employment dispute is a misuse of the FAIS Act’s provisions.
Notifications