Richmond Y. Wong
Jason Caleb Valdez
ABSTRACT
We use a design workbook of speculative scenarios as a values elicitation activity with 14 participants. The workbook depicts use case scenarios with smart home camera technologies that involve surveillance and uneven power relations. The scenarios were initially designed by the researchers to explore scenarios of privacy and surveillance within three social relationships involving “primary” and “non-primary” users: Parents-Children, Landlords-Tenants, and Residents-Domestic Workers. When the scenarios were utilized as part of a values elicitation activity with participants, we found that they reflected on a broader set of interconnected social values beyond privacy and surveillance, including autonomy and agency, physical safety, property rights, trust and accountability, and fairness. The paper suggests that future research about ethical issues in smart homes should conceptualize privacy as interconnected with a broader set of social values (which can align or be in tension with privacy), and reflects on considerations for doing research with non-primary users.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
- Imtiaz Ahmad, Rosta Farzan, Apu Kapadia, and Adam J. Lee. 2020. Tangible Privacy: Towards User-Centric Sensor Designs for Bystander Privacy. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW2, Article 116 (oct 2020), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415187Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ryan Aipperspach, Ben Hooker, and Allison Woodruff. 2008. The Heterogeneous Home. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Seoul, Korea) (UbiComp ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1145/1409635.1409666Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yoko Akama, Ann Light, and Takahito Kamihira. 2020. Expanding Participation to Design with More-Than-Human Concerns. In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1 (Manizales, Colombia) (PDC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385016Google ScholarDigital Library
- Irwin Altman. 1975. The environment and social behavior: privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co., Monterey, California.Google Scholar
- Mark Andrejevic. 2005. The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance and Society 2, 4 (2005), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v2i4.3359Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paritosh Bahirat, Martijn C. Willemsen, Yangyang He, Qizhang Sun, and Bart P. Knijnenburg. 2021. Overlooking Context : How do Defaults and Framing Reduce Deliberation in Smart Home Privacy Decision-Making?. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445672Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stephanie Ballard, Karen M. Chappell, and Kristen Kennedy. 2019. Judgment Call the Game: Using value sensitive design and design fiction to surface ethical concerns related to technology. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference - DIS ’19 (2019). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3323697Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1301–1310. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brian Barrett. 2015. Fuhu’s Kid-Centric Smart Home Is a Helicopter Parent’s Dream. Wired (8 7 2015). https://www.wired.com/2015/07/fuhu-smart-home/Google Scholar
- Eric P.S. Baumer. 2015. Usees. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3295–3298. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702147Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eric P.S. Baumer, Timothy Berrill, Sarah C. Botwinick, Jonathan L. Gonzales, Kevin Ho, Allison Kundrik, Luke Kwon, Tim LaRowe, Chanh P. Nguyen, Fredy Ramirez, Peter Schaedler, William Ulrich, Amber Wallace, Yuchen Wan, and Benjamin Weinfeld. 2018. What Would You Do? Design Fiction and Ethics. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3149405Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julia Bernd, Ruba Abu-Salma, Junghyun Choy, and Alisa Frik. 2022. Balancing Power Dynamics in Smart Homes: Nannies’ Perspectives on How Cameras Reflect and Affect Relationships. In Eighteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2022) (2022). USENIX Association, 687—706. https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2022/presentation/berndGoogle Scholar
- Julia Bernd, Ruba Abu-Salma, and Alisa Frik. 2020. Bystanders’ privacy: The perspectives of nannies on smart home surveillance. In FOCI 2020 - 10th USENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet (2020).Google Scholar
- Heidi Biggs, Cayla Key, Audrey Desjardins, and Afroditi Psarra. 2021. Moving Design Research: GIFs as Research Tools. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1927–1940. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462144Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dieter Bohn. 2020. The Ring drone is just the latest Amazon privacy puzzle box. The Verge (2020). https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/25/21455197/amazon-ring-drone-home-security-surveillance-sidewalk-halo-privacy [Online; accessed 2021-09-09].Google Scholar
- Andy Boucher, David Cameron, and Nadine Jarvis. 2012. Power to the People: Dynamic Energy Management through Communal Cooperation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318048Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pam Briggs and Lisa Thomas. 2015. An Inclusive, Value Sensitive Design Perspective on Future Identity Technologies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 22, 5 (10 8 2015), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2778972Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simone Browne. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Duke University Press, Durham.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joern Henning Buehring and Jeanne Liedtka. 2018. Embracing systematic futures thinking at the intersection of Strategic Planning, Foresight and Design. Journal of Innovation Management 6, 3 (23 11 2018), 134. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_006.003_0006Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel J. Butler, Justin Huang, Franziska Roesner, and Maya Cakmak. 2015. The Privacy-Utility Tradeoff for Remotely Teleoperated Robots. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (2015-03-02). ACM, Portland Oregon USA, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696484Google ScholarDigital Library
- John M Carroll (Ed.). 1995. Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
- George Chalhoub, Martin J Kraemer, Norbert Nthala, and Ivan Flechais. 2021. “It Did Not Give Me an Option to Decline”: A Longitudinal Analysis of the User Experience of Security and Privacy in Smart Home Products. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 555, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445691Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janet X. Chen, Francesco Vitale, and Joanna McGrenere. 2021. What Happens After Death? Using a Design Workbook to Understand User Expectations for Preparing their Data. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021-05-06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445359Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yuxin Chen, Huiying Li, Shan-Yuan Teng, Steven Nagels, Zhijing Li, Pedro Lopes, Ben Y. Zhao, and Haitao Zheng. 2020. Wearable Microphone Jamming. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376304Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu-Ting Cheng, Mathias Funk, Wenn-Chieh Tsai, and Lin-Lin Chen. 2019. Peekaboo Cam: Designing an observational camera for home ecologies concerning privacy. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2019-06-18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 823–836. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3323699Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eun Kyoung Choe, Sunny Consolvo, Jaeyeon Jung, Beverly Harrison, Shwetak N. Patel, and Julie A. Kientz. 2012. Investigating receptiveness to sensing and inference in the home using sensor proxies. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp ’12 (2012). ACM Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 61. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370226Google ScholarDigital Library
- Danielle Keats Citron and Daniel J. Solove. 2022. Privacy Harms. Boston University Law Review 102, 3 (2022), 793–864. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3782222Google ScholarCross Ref
- Camille Cobb, Sruti Bhagavatula, Kalil Anderson Garrett, Alison Hoffman, Varun Rao, and Lujo Bauer. 2021. “I would have to evaluate their objections”: Privacy tensions between smart home device owners and incidental users. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2021, 4 (1 10 2021), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2021-0060Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brendan David-John, Diane Hosfelt, Kevin Butler, and Eakta Jain. 2021. Let’s SOUP up XR: Collected thoughts from an IEEE VR workshop on privacy in mixed reality. In VR4Sec: Security for VR and VR for Security, SOUPS 2021 Workshop.Google Scholar
- Maria Puig de la Bellacasa. 2010. Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science 41, 1 (Dec. 2010), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301Google ScholarCross Ref
- Teresa Denefleh, Arne Berger, Albrecht Kurze, and Chris Frauenberger. 2019. Sensorstation: Exploring Simple Sensor Data in the Context of a Shared Apartment. In Proceedings of the 2019 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322309Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carl DiSalvo, Tom Jenkins, and Thomas Lodato. 2016. Designing Speculative Civics. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4979–4990. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858505Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carl DiSalvo, Jonathan Lukens, Thomas Lodato, Tom Jenkins, and Tanyoung Kim. 2014. Making public things: How HCI Design Can Express Matters of Concern. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2014-04-26). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2397–2406. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557359Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cynthia Dwork and Mulligan. 2013. It’s not privacy, and it’s not fair. Stanford Law Review Online 66 (2013), 35–40.Google Scholar
- Nils Ehrenberg and Turkka Keinonen. 2021. The Technology Is Enemy for Me at the Moment: How Smart Home Technologies Assert Control Beyond Intent. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021-05-06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445058Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chris Elsden, David Chatting, Abigail C. Durrant, Andrew Garbett, Bettina Nissen, John Vines, and David S. Kirk. 2017. On Speculative Enactments. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2017-05-02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5386–5399. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025503Google ScholarDigital Library
- Felix Anand Epp, Tim Moesgen, Antti Salovaara, Emmi Pouta, and İdil Gaziulusoy. 2022. Reinventing the Wheel: The Future Ripples Method for Activating Anticipatory Capacities in Innovation Teams. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2022-06-13). ACM, Virtual Event Australia, 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3534570Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martyn Evans. 2003. Trend Forecasting for Design Futures. In European Academy of Design Conference (2003).Google Scholar
- Yuanyuan Feng, Yaxing Yao, and Norman Sadeh. 2021. A Design Space for Privacy Choices: Towards Meaningful Privacy Control in the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445148Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casey Fiesler. 2019. Ethical Considerations for Research Involving (Speculative) Public Data. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, GROUP (5 12 2019), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3370271Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casey Fiesler. 2021. Ethical Speculation in the Computing Classroom. In 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT) (2021-05-23). IEEE, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT51740.2021.9620641Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mary Flanagan and Helen Nissenbaum. 2014. Groundwork for Values in Games. In Values at Play in Digital Games. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity. 2016. Cybersecurity futures 2020. Technical Report. 128 pages. https://cltc.berkeley.edu/2016/04/28/cybersecurity-futures-2020/Google Scholar
- Diana Freed, Jackeline Palmer, Diana Minchala, Karen Levy, Thomas Ristenpart, and Nicola Dell. 2018. "A Stalker’s Paradise": How Intimate Partner Abusers Exploit Technology. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’18 (2018). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174241Google ScholarDigital Library
- Batya Friedman, David G. Hendry, and Alan Borning. 2017. A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 11, 2 (2017), 63–125. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000015Google ScholarDigital Library
- Radhika Garg and Hua Cui. 2022. Social Contexts, Agency, and Conflicts: Exploring Critical Aspects of Design for Future Smart Home Technologies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 29, 2 (30 4 2022), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485058Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bill Gaver and Heather Martin. 2000. Alternatives: Exploring Information Appliances through Conceptual Design Proposals. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands) (CHI ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332433Google ScholarDigital Library
- William Gaver. 2011. Making spaces: how design workbooks work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11) (2011). 1551–1560. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979169Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elisa Giaccardi, Nazli Cila, Chris Speed, and Melissa Caldwell. 2016. Thing Ethnography: Doing Design Research with Non-Humans. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) (DIS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901905Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christina Harrington and Tawanna R. Dillahunt. 2021. Eliciting Tech Futures Among Black Young Adults: A Case Study of Remote Speculative Co-Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021-05-06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445723Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hilary Hutchinson, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, Björn Eiderbäck, Wendy Mackay, Bosse Westerlund, Benjamin B Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, and Helen Evans. 2003. Technology probes. In Proceedings of the conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI ’03) (2003). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642616Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alan Jacobs. 2016. Attending to Technology - Theses for Disputation. The New Atlantis (2016). https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/attending-to-technology-theses-for-disputationGoogle Scholar
- Nassim JafariNaimi, Lisa Nathan, and Ian Hargraves. 2015. Values as Hypotheses: Design, Inquiry, and the Service of Values. Design Issues 31, 4 (10 2015), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00354Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tom Jenkins. 2017. Living Apart, Together: Cohousing as a Site for ICT Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (2017-06-10). ACM, Edinburgh United Kingdom, 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064751Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cayla Key, Fiona Browne, Nick Taylor, and Jon Rogers. 2021. Proceed with Care: Reimagining Home IoT Through a Care Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 166, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445602Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bran Knowles, Sophie Beck, Joe Finney, James Devine, and Joseph Lindley. 2019. A Scenario-Based Methodology for Exploring Risks: Children and Programmable IoT. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2019-06-18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 751–761. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322315Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vinay Koshy, Joon Sung Sung Park, Ti-Chung Cheng, and Karrie Karahalios. 2021. “We Just Use What They Give Us”: Understanding Passenger User Perspectives in Smart Homes. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 41, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445598Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sandjar Kozubaev, Chris Elsden, Noura Howell, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard, Nick Merrill, Britta Schulte, and Richmond Y Wong. 2020. Expanding Modes of Reflection in Design Futuring. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020-04-21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376526Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sandjar Kozubaev, Fernando Rochaix, Carl DiSalvo, and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2019. Spaces and Traces: Implications of Smart Technology in Public Housing. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’19 (2019). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300669Google ScholarDigital Library
- Albrecht Kurze, Andreas Bischof, Sören Totzauer, Michael Storz, Maximilian Eibl, Margot Brereton, and Arne Berger. 2020. Guess the Data: Data Work to Understand How People Make Sense of and Use Simple Sensor Data from Homes. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020-04-21). ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376273Google ScholarDigital Library
- Josephine Lau, Benjamin Zimmerman, and Florian Schaub. 2018. Alexa, Are You Listening?: Privacy Perceptions, Concerns and Privacy-seeking Behaviors with Smart Speakers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (11 2018), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274371Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher A. Le Dantec, Erika Shehan Poole, and Susan P. Wyche. 2009. Values as lived experience: Evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI 09 (2009). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1141. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518875Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hosub Lee and Alfred Kobsa. 2020. Confident Privacy Decision-Making in IoT Environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 27, 1 (23 1 2020), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364223Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joseph Lindley, Haider Ali Akmal, and Paul Coulton. 2020. Design Research and Object-Oriented Ontology. Open Philosophy 3, 1 (Jan. 2020), 11–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph Lindley, Haider Ali Akmal, Franziska Pilling, and Paul Coulton. 2020. Researching AI Legibility through Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376792Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jen Liu, Daragh Byrne, and Laura Devendorf. 2018. Design for Collaborative Survival: An Inquiry into Human-Fungi Relationships. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173614Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dan Lockton, Devika Singh, Saloni Sabnis, Michelle Chou, Sarah Foley, and Alejandro Pantoja. 2019. New Metaphors: A workshop method for generating ideas and reframing problems in design and beyond. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition (2019-06-13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3326570Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karola Marky, Sarah Prange, Florian Krell, Max Mühlhäuser, and Florian Alt. 2020. “You just can’t know about everything”: Privacy Perceptions of Smart Home Visitors. In 19th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (2020-11-22). ACM, Essen Germany, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428361.3428464Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karola Marky, Sarah Prange, Max Mühlhäuser, and Florian Alt. 2021. Roles Matter! Understanding Differences in the Privacy Mental Models of Smart Home Visitors and Residents. In 20th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (2021-05-12). ACM, Leuven Belgium, 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490632.3490664Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roger Martin. 2009. The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Edge. Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Ramia Mazé 2019. Politics of designing visions of the future. Journal of Futures Studies 23, 3 (2019), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201903_23(3).0003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nora McDonald, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Morgan G. Ames, Nicola Dell, Elizabeth Keneski, Manya Sleeper, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2020. Privacy and Power: Acknowledging the Importance of Privacy Research and Design for Vulnerable Populations. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020-04-25). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375174Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nora McDonald and Andrea Forte. 2020. The Politics of Privacy Theories: Moving from Norms to Vulnerabilities. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020-04-21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376167Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nick Merrill. 2020. Security Fictions: Bridging Speculative Design and Computer Security. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2020-07-03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1727–1735. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395451Google ScholarDigital Library
- Deirdre K. Mulligan and Jennifer King. 2011. Bridging the gap between privacy and design. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (2011), 989–1034.Google Scholar
- Deirdre K. Mulligan, Colin Koopman, and Nick Doty. 2016. Privacy is an essentially contested concept: a multi-dimensional analytic for mapping privacy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374, 2083 (28 12 2016), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0118Google ScholarCross Ref
- Deirdre K. Mulligan, Joshua A. Kroll, Nitin Kohli, and Richmond Y. Wong. 2019. This Thing Called Fairness: Disciplinary confusion realizing a value in technology. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (7 11 2019), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359221Google ScholarDigital Library
- Deirdre K. Mulligan and Helen Nissenbaum. 2020. The Concept of Handoff as a Model for Ethical Analysis and Design. In The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI, Markus D. Dubber, Frank Pasquale, and Sunit Das (Eds.). Oxford University Press, 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.15Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pardis Emami Naeini, Sruti Bhagavatula, Hana Habib, Martin Degeling, Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Cranor, and Norman Sadeh. 2017. Privacy Expectations and Preferences in an IoT World. In Thirteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2017) (2017). 399–412.Google Scholar
- Larissa Vivian Nägele, Merja Ryöppy, and Danielle Wilde. 2018. PDFi: Participatory Design Fiction with Vulnerable Users. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Oslo, Norway) (NordiCHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 819–831. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240272Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lisa P. Nathan, Batya Friedman, Predrag Klasnja, Shaun K. Kane, and Jessica K. Miller. 2008. Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems - DIS ’08 (2008). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394446Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helen Nissenbaum. 2009. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Renee Noortman, Britta F. Schulte, Paul Marshall, Saskia Bakker, and Anna L. Cox. 2019. HawkEye - Deploying a Design Fiction Probe. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’19 (2019). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300652Google ScholarDigital Library
- William Odom, Sumeet Anand, Doenja Oogjes, and Jo Shin. 2019. Diversifying the Domestic: A Design Inquiry into Collective and Mobile Living. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference - DIS ’19 (2019). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1377–1390. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3323687Google ScholarDigital Library
- Doenja Oogjes, William Odom, and Pete Fung. 2018. Designing for an other Home: Expanding and Speculating on Different Forms of Domestic Life. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018 - DIS ’18 (2018). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196810Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Pierce. 2019. Lamps, Curtains, Robots: 3 scenarios for the future of the smart home. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition - C&C ’19 (2019). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 423–424. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3329181Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Pierce. 2019. Smart Home Security Cameras and Shifting Lines of Creepiness: A Design-Led Inquiry. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019-05-02). ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300275Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Pierce. 2021. Eccentric Sensing Devices: Using Conceptual Design Notes to Understand Design Opportunities, Limitations, and Concerns Connected to Digital Sensing. In Creativity and Cognition (Virtual Event, Italy) (C&C ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 37, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3466775Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Pierce and Carl DiSalvo. 2018. Addressing Network Anxieties with Alternative Design Metaphors. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174123Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Pierce, Sarah Fox, Nick Merrill, and Richmond Wong. 2018. Differential Vulnerabilities and a Diversity of Tactics: What Toolkits Teach Us about Cybersecurity. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (1 11 2018), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274408Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Pierce, Sarah Fox, Nick Merrill, Richmond Wong, and Carl DiSalvo. 2018. An Interface without A User: An Exploratory Design Study of Online Privacy Policies and Digital Legalese. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1345–1358. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196818Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Pierce, Claire Weizenegger, Parag Nandi, Isha Agarwal, Gwenna Gram, Jade Hurrle, Hannah Liao, Betty Lo, Aaron Park, Aivy Phan, Mark Shumskiy, and Grace Sturlaugson. 2022. Addressing Adjacent Actor Privacy: Designing for Bystanders, Co-Users, and Surveilled Subjects of Smart Home Cameras. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2022-06-13). ACM, Virtual Event Australia, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3535195Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Pierce, Richmond Y. Wong, and Nick Merrill. 2020. Sensor Illumination: Exploring Design Qualities and Ethical Implications of Smart Cameras and Image/Video Analytics. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20) (2020). 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376347Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jon Rogers, Loraine Clarke, Martin Skelly, Nick Taylor, Pete Thomas, Michelle Thorne, Solana Larsen, Katarzyna Odrozek, Julia Kloiber, Peter Bihr, Anab Jain, Jon Arden, and Max von Grafenstein. 2019. Our Friends Electric: Reflections on Advocacy and Design Research for the Voice Enabled Internet. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300344Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnny Saldaña. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Katie Shilton. 2018. Values and Ethics in Human-Computer Interaction. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 12, 2 (2018), 107–171. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000073Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katie Shilton, Donal Heidenblad, Adam Porter, Susan Winter, and Mary Kendig. 2020. Role-Playing Computer Ethics: Designing and Evaluating the Privacy by Design (PbD) Simulation. Science and Engineering Ethics (1 7 2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00250-0Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel J. Solove. 2002. Conceptualizing privacy. California Law Review 90 (2002), 1087–1155. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929609.1929610Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel J. Solove. 2003. A Taxonomy of Privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154, 3 (2003), 477–560.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel J Solove. 2008. Privacy: A Concept in Disarray. In Understanding privacy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Luke Stark and Karen Levy. 2018. The surveillant consumer. Media, Culture & Society 40, 8 (25 11 2018), 1202–1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718781985Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yolande Strengers, Jenny Kennedy, Paula Arcari, Larissa Nicholls, and Melissa Gregg. 2019. Protection, Productivity and Pleasure in the Smart Home: Emerging Expectations and Gendered Insights from Australian Early Adopters. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019-05-02). ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300875Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shea Swauger. 2020. Software that monitors students during tests perpetuates inequality and violates their privacy. MIT Technology Review (7 8 2020). https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/08/07/1006132/software-algorithms-proctoring-online-tests-ai-ethics/Google Scholar
- Madiha Tabassum, Jess Kropczynski, Pamela Wisniewski, and Heather Richter Lipford. 2020. Smart Home Beyond the Home: A Case for Community-Based Access Control. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020-04-21). ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376255Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neilly H. Tan, Brian Kinnee, Dana Langseth, Sean A. Munson, and Audrey Desjardins. 2022. Critical-Playful Speculations with Cameras in the Home. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2022-04-29). ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502109Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neilly H. Tan, Richmond Y. Wong, Audrey Desjardins, Sean A. Munson, and James Pierce. 2022. Monitoring Pets, Deterring Intruders, and Casually Spying on Neighbors: Everyday Uses of Smart Home Cameras. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2022-04-29). ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517617Google ScholarDigital Library
- Parth Kirankumar Thakkar, Shijing He, Shiyu Xu, Danny Yuxing Huang, and Yaxing Yao. 2022. “It would probably turn into a social faux-pas”: Users’ and Bystanders’ Preferences of Privacy Awareness Mechanisms in Smart Homes. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2022-04-29). ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502137Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jasper Tran O’Leary, Sara Zewde, Jennifer Mankoff, and Daniela K Rosner. 2019. Who Gets to Future? Race, Representation, and Design Methods in Africatown. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’19 (2019). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300791Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blase Ur, Jaeyeon Jung, and Stuart Schechter. 2014. Intruders versus intrusiveness: Teens’ and Parents’ Perspectives on Home-Entryway Surveillance. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (2014-09-13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632107Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eero Vaara and Richard Whittington. 2012. Strategy-as-Practice: Taking Social Practices Seriously. Academy of Management Annals 6, 1 (6 2012), 285–336. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.672039Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kees van der Heijden. 2005. Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
- Joost M. Vervoort, Roy Bendor, Aisling Kelliher, Oscar Strik, and Ariella E.R. Helfgott. 2015. Scenarios and the art of worldmaking. Futures 74 (11 2015), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.009Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pierre Wack. 1985. Scenarios: uncharted waters ahead. Harvard Business Review 63, 5 (1985), 73–89.Google Scholar
- Ron Wakkary. 2021. Things We Could Design: For More Than Human-Centered Worlds. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Steven Weber. 1996. Counterfactuals, past and future. In Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives, Phlip E. Tetlock and Aaron Belkin (Eds.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
- Richmond Y Wong, Karen Boyd, Jake Metcalf, and Katie Shilton. 2020. Beyond Checklist Approaches to Ethics in Design. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (2020-10-17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406865.3418590Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richmond Y. Wong and Vera Khovanskaya. 2018. Speculative Design in HCI: From Corporate Imaginations to Critical Orientations. In New Directions in 3rd Wave HCI, Michael Filimowicz (Ed.). Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 175–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_10Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richmond Y Wong, Vera Khovanskaya, Sarah E Fox, Nick Merrill, and Phoebe Sengers. 2020. Infrastructural Speculations: Tactics for Designing and Interrogating Lifeworlds. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020-04-21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376515Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richmond Y. Wong and Deirdre K. Mulligan. 2019. Bringing Design to the Privacy Table: Broadening "Design" in "Privacy by Design" Through the Lens of HCI. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2019) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300492Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richmond Y. Wong, Deirdre K Mulligan, Ellen Van Wyk, James Pierce, and John Chuang. 2017. Eliciting Values Reflections by Engaging Privacy Futures Using Design Workbooks. Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3134746Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richmond Y. Wong and Tonya Nguyen. 2021. Timelines: A World-Building Activity for Values Advocacy. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021-05-06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445447Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yanlai Wu, Xinning Gui, Pamela J. Wisniewski, and Yao Li. 2023. Do Streamers Care about Bystanders’ Privacy? An Examination of Live Streamers’ Considerations and Strategies for Bystanders’ Privacy Management. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, CSCW1, Article 127 (apr 2023), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579603Google ScholarDigital Library
- Susan Wyche. 2021. The Benefits of Using Design Workbooks with Speculative Design Proposals in Information Communication Technology for Development (ICTD). In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (2021-06-28). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1861–1874. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462140Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yaxing Yao, Justin Reed Basdeo, Oriana Rosata Mcdonough, and Yang Wang. 2019. Privacy Perceptions and Designs of Bystanders in Smart Homes. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (7 11 2019), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359161Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eric Zeng, Shrirang Mare, and Franziska Roesner. 2017. End User Security and Privacy Concerns with Smart Homes. In Thirteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2017) (2017). 65–80. https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2017/technical-sessions/presentation/zengGoogle Scholar
- Eric Zeng and Franziska Roesner. 2019. Understanding and Improving Security and Privacy in Multi-User Smart Homes: A Design Exploration and In-Home User Study. In 28th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 19) (2019). USENIX Association, 159—176. https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity19/presentation/zengGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Broadening Privacy and Surveillance: Eliciting Interconnected Values with a Scenarios Workbook on Smart Home Cameras
Recommendations
Monitoring Pets, Deterring Intruders, and Casually Spying on Neighbors: Everyday Uses of Smart Home Cameras
CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe increased adoption of smart home cameras (SHCs) foregrounds issues of surveillance, power, and privacy in homes and neighborhoods. However, questions remain about how people are currently using these devices to monitor and surveil, what the benefits ...
Privacy challenges in smart homes for people with dementia and people with intellectual disabilities
AbstractThe aim of this paper is to analyse the ethical issues relating to privacy that arise in smart homes designed for people with dementia and for people with intellectual disabilities. We outline five different conceptual perspectives on privacy and ...
Privacy and Ethical Considerations of Smart Environments: A Philosophical Approach on Smart Meters
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 WorkshopsAbstractThis paper delves into the privacy and ethical concerns related to smart devices in IoT, particularly smart meters. It explores the regulatory framework governing data protection through the lens of GDPR. Our analysis identifies relevant GDPR ...
Comments