Today, 11 Democrats on the House Intelligence and Armed Services Committees, led by Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), wrote to Director of National Intelligence Don Coats requesting a classified report detailing the analysis the Trump Administration used in issuing its revised travel ban covering nationals of five majority Muslim countries, North Korea and Venezuela.
Original Title
Intelligence and Armed Services Democrats Demand Access to Report Used to Justify Trump’s Muslim Ban
Today, 11 Democrats on the House Intelligence and Armed Services Committees, led by Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), wrote to Director of National Intelligence Don Coats requesting a classified report detailing the analysis the Trump Administration used in issuing its revised travel ban covering nationals of five majority Muslim countries, North Korea and Venezuela.
Today, 11 Democrats on the House Intelligence and Armed Services Committees, led by Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), wrote to Director of National Intelligence Don Coats requesting a classified report detailing the analysis the Trump Administration used in issuing its revised travel ban covering nationals of five majority Muslim countries, North Korea and Venezuela.
Congress of the United States
‘Washington, BE 20515
June 28, 2018
‘The Honorable Daniel Coats
Director of National Intelligence
Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Washington, D.C. 20511
Dear Director Coats:
As members of the House Intelligence and Armed Services Committees, we write to request a
classified report detailing the analysis that the Trump Administration undertook before issuing its
revised travel ban covering nationals of five majority Muslim countries, North Korea, and
Venezuela. While its contents were never revealed to the Supreme Court, the report was used to
successfully argue for the constitutionality of this policy and was cited in the majority
opinion, Given that it reportedly includes an “extensive” analysis of information systems and the
security situation in “every country in the world,” we believe that this document is of significant
interest to our committees.
In Trump v. Hawaii, the Administration asserted that the President’s travel ban resulted from an.
extensive analysis conducted by multiple federal agencies and that “entry restrictions” were
imposed pursuant to this evaluation. Subsequently, Chief Justice John Roberts cited this study in
his majority opinion, noting that the President had acted within his legal authorities “based on his
findings—following a worldwide, multi-agency review—that entry of the covered aliens would
be detrimental to the national interest.”
However, while the Administration claimed that the report in question includes an analysis of
over 200 countries, it was later forced to admit that the entire document amounts to a mere 16
pages plus a one-page attachment. Based on the brevity of this report and President Trump’s
‘unwillingness to share it with the Court, we have serious concems about the thoroughness of the
Administration's analysis and whether it was used to justify decisions that the President had
already made.
This analysis is clearly relevant to our responsibility to conduct oversight of national security
policy. Please provide the report in classified or unclassified form by August 1 Thank you for
your prompt attention to this request
Sincerely,
Ruben Gallego
Member of Congress‘Anthony G. Brown: oy O. Carbajal
Member of Congress Member of Congress
aa A. Vanald M Earle
Mare A. Veasé A. Donald McEachin
Member of Congress Member of Congress
ce
Un) CAD
ric Swaly
Member of Congress ember of Congress
Niki Tsongas
Member of Congress