Skip to main content
Download PDF

Impact of the first year of the “This Girl Can” physical activity and sport mass media campaign in Australia

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 333 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Addressing gender inequalities in physical activity is an important public health goal. A major campaign, ‘This Girl Can’ (TGC) was conducted by Sport England from 2015, and TGC was licenced in 2018 by VicHealth in Australia for development and use in a 3-year mass media campaign. The campaign was adapted through formative testing to Australian conditions and implemented within the state of Victoria. The purpose of this evaluation was to assess the initial population impact of the first wave of the TGC-Victoria.

Methods

We assessed campaign impact using serial population surveys, with the target population being women living in Victoria who were not meeting the current physical activity guidelines. Two surveys were carried out before the campaign (October 2017 and March 2018), and the post-campaign survey immediately following the first wave of TGC-Victoria mass media (May 2018). Analyses were primarily on the cohort sample of 818 low-active women followed across all three surveys. We measured campaign effects using campaign awareness and recall, and self-report measures of physical activity behaviour and perceptions of being judged. Changes in perceptions of being judged and in reported physical activity were assessed in relation to campaign awareness over time.

Results

Overall, TGC-Victoria campaign recall increased from 11.2% pre-campaign to 31.9% post-campaign, with campaign awareness more likely among younger and more educated women. There was a slight increase of 0.19 days in weekly physical activity following the campaign. Feeling that being judged was a barrier to physical activity declined at follow up, as did the single item perceptions of feeling judged (P < 0.01). Feeling embarrassed decreased, and self-determination increased, but exercise relevance, theory of planned behaviour and self-efficacy scores did not change.

Conclusions

The initial wave of the TGC-Victoria mass media campaign showed reasonably high levels of community awareness and encouraging decreases in women feeling judged whilst being active, but these did not yet translate into overall physical activity gains. Further waves of the TGC-V campaign are in progress to reinforce these changes and further influence the perception of being judged among low-active Victorian women.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Promoting physical activity is an important part of noncommunicable disease prevention and requires integrated and systems wide strategies [1]. Several decades of representative population surveys across many countries have identified that women generally report less physical activity than men and report more structural and life-focused barriers to being active yet have higher rates of intending to be physically active [2,3,4]. The same pattern is true for adolescent girls and young women [4], and population changes over time in physical activity appear smaller in girls than boys [5]. The differences overall are quite marked, with the absolute prevalence of not meeting physical activity guidelines for women around 8% higher than men, as determined in a study of 168 countries [3]. There is also evidence of substantial gender disparity in the prevalence of sport participation, especially at elite levels [6].

Recent strategies have focused on women in sport and promoting participation in physical activity [7,8,9]. One of the initial recommended strategies is the use of mass media campaigns and community-wide strategies to change attitudes and social norms towards participation, particularly among women [1].

Towards this goal, the comprehensive “This Girl Can” (TGC) campaign was launched by Sport England in 2015, targeting women of all ages. TGC aimed to change women’s attitudes to feeling embarrassed or judged while participating in sport or exercise, with a population target of increasing the proportion of women participating in physical activity or sport at least once a week [10]. It received substantial support from Sport England in the form of paid mainstream media advertisements, publicity, community events, and support from regional and national sport organisations. TGC earned substantial media coverage and recognition, not only for its physical activity promotion but also for its attempt to change gender stereotypes and community values around activity and sport [10, 11]. The substantial extent of the mainstream media coverage of TGC is shown in Supplementary material Figure S1, peaking at 113 media reports around the TGC-V launch in 2018.

Amongst previous physical activity campaigns, few targeted adolescent girls or reported results that were gender specific; exceptions were a Montreal campaign for adolescent girls [12, 13], a national Australian campaign [14], and another Canadian campaign promoting active travel [15]. For middle-aged women, gender specific effects were reported in a Hawaiian campaign for middle-aged adults [16] and a local community campaign in South Carolina [17]. A few other campaigns reported effects separately for women [18, 19], but most campaigns did not target gender-specific changes in attitudes to physical activity or sport.

Formative message testing has indicated that the message frame and content should be different for women compared to messages targeting all adults [11,12,13]. Messages for women require different branding of physical activity [13] and should address different attitudes and barriers to inactivity [14]. Although women may be more likely to see or hear mass media campaign messages [20], the subsequent stages of campaign execution should be developed specifically for women [21].

Based on the interest generated by the TGC campaign, the state Health Promotion Foundation in Victoria, Australia (known as VicHealth) licensed it for use in the state of Victoria, Australia. VicHealth explored the meanings of physical activity and sport amongst Victorian women and developed a program logic model for the Victorian campaign. Qualitative formative research examined the perceptions of feeling judged among Victorian women, and identified how women perceived their bodies and social pressures from others led to feelings of being judged and ashamed, and that was a contributor to reducing women’s engagement in physical activity [22]. Different messages were tested and adapted from the English campaign to the multicultural Australian context in Victoria [22]. The campaign aimed to change attitudes to physical activity and sport and increase participation amongst Victorian women, particularly targeting those who were not meeting current physical activity guidelines [23]. Similar to the Sport England TGC campaign, messages were designed for women of all ages, sizes and shapes, with themes focusing on increasing confidence and reducing fears of being judged for being physically active.

The formative research led to the “This Girl Can – Victoria” (TGC-V) campaign, which was launched in March 2018 for an initial three-year period. The campaign comprised paid mass media, a strong digital and website presence, community events and community groups, profiling community supporters and local champions. In addition,, collaboration with elite sport organisations, such as Australian Rules (women) football teams and local sport and recreation agencies (https://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/programs-and-projects/this-girl-can-vic#). The campaign was overseen by an advisory group that included community and government stakeholders, which provided guidance on the implementation of strategies to target all Victorian women (i.e., including disadvantaged or minority subpopulations).

The aim of this paper is to report on the short-term effects of the TGC-V campaign, comparing two pre-campaign baseline surveys, and then a comparison with the post-campaign survey following wave 1 of the campaign. The primary outcomes were assessed in a cohort of Victorian women and consisted of changes in awareness of the TGC-V campaign, changes in perceptions of feeling judged, and changes in reported weekly physical activity. The primary target group were low active or inactive women in Victoria, Australia, defined as those not meeting recommended physical activity levels for health. Secondary outcomes included measures of perceived relevance of exercise, theoretical measures around attitudes and efficacy towards being active, barriers to exercise and feeling embarrassed about exercise.

Methods

Process and impact evaluation were used to assess campaign reach and whether it met its objectives. Process evaluation comprised monitoring of community events, campaign supporters and ambassadors, social media usage, paid media delivered, and unpaid public relations. In the first year, the dose of purchased media was delivered through 15 to 60 s media spots, with a total of 700 Target Audience Ratings points (TARPs) in urban areas, and 860 TARPs in rural regions. Impact evaluation was based on population surveys of women aged 18 to 65 from across Victoria, with a defined cohort of 1032 women followed through two sequential pre-campaign surveys (18 October to 3rd November 2017, and 2nd March to 20th March 2018) and a survey following the first wave of TGC-V mass media (7th May to 4th June 2018). Additional analyses on the independent samples (different groups of women at each time point) are shown as Supplementary material.

The data were collected by an accredited online market research panel (TEG Insights). Invitations to complete the survey were sent to a random sample of panel participants who were eligible (female, aged 18–65 and living in the state of Victoria). Quotas were derived by age group and regional/urban residents to match the Australian Bureau of Statistics data for women in Victoria.

Measures used

The primary self-report outcomes asked of Victorian women were about their physical activity participation and questions about their personal sense of embarrassment and being judged during physical activity, derived from the Sport England TGC campaign evaluation [24]. Physical activity measures included the single item measure in the past week [25, 26] as well as questions allowing stage of change for physical activity to be calculated. Those reporting 5 or more days of activity were likely to be physically active, and those reporting 0–4 days considered ‘low active’ [27]. The stage of change algorithm is based on five categories derived from a readiness to engage in physical activity measure [28].

Being judged was assessed in three ways, all rated on scales of 0 to 10: (i) perceptions of being judged as a barrier to activity; (ii) worry about being judged whilst exercising; and (iii) a single ‘feeling judged’ item. The items on ‘being judged as a barrier’ were reverse coded, so that for all judgement questions, a lower score indicated less worry or embarrassment. Questions are provided in Supplementary Material #1.

Additional questions were asked about perceived relevance of exercise, motivational readiness to change, self-efficacy, theory of planned behaviour and self-determination theory, with items adapted from existing measures to assess attitudes, subjective norms and needs [29,30,31]. Questions were also asked about recall of generic and campaign specific messages, which also included prompted TGC-specific recall questions.

Summary scores were constructed from groups of individual items in each of the areas above. These scores showed very good to excellent internal consistency with the number of items and Cronbach’s alpha values as follows in the cohort sample at baseline: ‘exercise relevant to me’ scale (8 items, α = 0.77); theory of planned behaviour questions (6 items, α = 0.92); self-determination (4 items, α = 0.85); embarrassed about exercise (7 items, α = 0.89); judgement barriers (3 items, α = 0.91); and worry about being judged (3 items, α = 0.81). Generic campaign awareness was assessed by responses to the question “in the past month have you seen any advertising (such as videos, TV ads, Facebook, Instagram or Twitter posts, website ads, or ads at or on public transport) about exercise and playing sport in relation to women and girls”. Prompted recall was whether they recalled the specific “this girl can” message or logo.

Demographic data comprised age (categorised as 18–34, 35–49 and 50 + years), educational attainment (tertiary education or other), country of birth (COB; Australia/other) and language spoken at home English/other), Indigenous status (yes/no), occupation and income, urban/rural residence and self-reported presence of a disability which limited movement (yes/no).

Statistical methods, using SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp. Released 2021. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, 28.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp), comprised comparing means across the baseline and follow up time points, using generalised linear models with Bonferroni adjustment for post hoc contrasts, and logistic regression modelling of factors associated with positive changes in physical activity and in feeling judged. Significance is reported at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 levels. The primary research questions were to assess the impact of the initial TGC-V campaign effects on awareness, feeling judged, and physical activity measures using the target group, the cohort of 818 women who were inactive/low active at baseline.

Results

The baseline characteristics of survey responders in the cohort, low active cohort and the independent samples are shown in Table 1. The cohort (n = 1032) was similar in age distribution, education, children, occupation, income, Indigenous status, residential location and self-reported disability to the subset of low-active women (n = 818) used in the primary analysis. These cohort characteristics were similar to the independent samples for all variables except for the age category, where the cohort sample was younger. Proportions meeting the five times a week 30 min physical activity level were also consistent.

The data in Table 2 show changes in physical activity, feeling judged, and other attitude measures. Reported physical activity days increased from the baseline to the second pre-campaign measure and were still greater than baseline at follow up. No change was noted in the proportion exercising in the previous week (54.8%, 55.6% and 56.1% respectively), or in the proportion in the action/maintenance stages of change (53.9%, 56.4% and 52.3% post campaign). Although the core data for this analysis is the 818 people who were low active at the first baseline, changes in physical activity levels can be assessed across the cohort. Of those low active at baseline, 69 people increased to meet the guideline level at post-campaign, and 86 relapsed from meeting the guideline at baseline to not meeting the guideline at follow-up.

All measures of being judged improved at the post campaign measure, with reductions in feeling judged as a barrier and the single item ‘feeling judged’ both significantly lower following the campaign. The ‘feeling embarrassed’ score also declined significantly following the campaign. (Table 2). No changes were evident in perceived exercise relevance, theory of planned behaviour, self-determination or physical activity self-efficacy measures.

Campaign awareness was assessed at all timepoints among Victorian low-active women. Recall of any generic message about physical activity and sport for women or girls was similar at both baselines and follow up (respectively 24.6%, 25.1% and 28.9%). Specific TGC-V recall was reported by 11.2% at baseline1, 13.2% at baseline2, and 31.9% at post campaign, indicating a significant increase in prompted awareness of the campaign by name (p < 0.01). All women were then shown the TGC messages as part of the online survey, and 71.9% reported the message was easy to understand, and 26.0% said they wanted to find out more. Most felt the message encouraged women to be active (77.9%) and 86.2% thought the message was effective in overcoming the fear of being judged.

There were 31.9% of participants who reported recalling the campaign at follow up. Higher rates of recall were reported by were reported by younger and more tertiary educated women (Fig. 1). Adjusted analyses using logistic models were similar, with age remaining significant; compared to younger adults, middle-aged adults were less likely to recall the TGC campaign (AdjOR 0.60, 95%CI 0.41–0.89), as were older adults (AdjOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35–0.74). Level of education was borderline significant (p = 0.051); with the tertiary educated more likely to recall the campaign, (AdjOR 1.36, 95%CI 0.99–1.86). Other demographic characteristics including income, country of birth, rural residence, Indigenous status, having children and reported disability were not associated with awareness of TGC-V.

Finally, the factors associated with any changes in physical activity days and the perception of feeling judged whilst playing sport are shown in Table 3. There were 31.7% of the low-active women who reported an increase in physical activity by ≥ 1 day (mean change 0.19 days (1.68)), and 38% who reported any decrease in feeling judged on the single item question (mean change − 0.25 (2.52)). Factors associated with those who made a positive change are shown in Table 3. Older women were less likely to make any change on either physical activity or being judged, but no other demographic characteristics were significant. Recalling the TGC-V message or logo was not related to change in physical activity or feeling judged. Additional analyses (Supplementary Table 3) show these analyses for women who made much larger changes in physical activity or decreases in feeling judged, decreases in the ‘barriers-feeling judged’ or ‘worry-feeling judged’ scores, and results were very similar, with no significant associations with TGC-V campaign recall.

Discussion

Lower rates of physical activity among women are likely to be influenced by attitudes and perceptions of being judged, and by a lack of confidence in being active. These factors may be amenable to influence by a mass media campaign, and hence these results are important in long-term public health approaches to reducing inequalities in physical activity by gender. The initial wave of the VicHealth “This Girl Can” campaign showed some promising effects on perceptions of being judged, with reductions in feeling embarrassed. No substantial changes were noted in other attitudes, beliefs or self-efficacy, with limited changes in physical activity measures or in stages of change. TGC-V was recognised by around a third of women in this first post campaign assessment, prompted recall that is typical of physical activity campaigns[32]. Younger women, targeted in this campaign, were more likely to recall the specific campaign message or theme. As this was only the first wave of a multi-year TGC-V campaign, subsequent improvements in recognition across serial iterations of the campaign might be expected [33]. Nonetheless, the overall effects of wave one of TGC-V were modest, with similar effects seen in the cohort and independent sample data. However, although effects in the independent samples were in similar directions, they were smaller than in the cohort, indicating the possibility of a learning or pre-test sensitisation effect in the cohort due to repeat administration of the questions.

The rationale for both the UK TGC and the TGC-V campaigns was the consistent gender gap in sport and exercise across populations and over time [34, 35] and that this may be moderated by anxiety symptoms [36]. This inequality can potentially be influenced by mass communications campaigns that target gender stereotypes by showcasing women with a variety of body shapes and sizes being physically active, and the different ways people can engage in physical activity, to shift norms and reduce barriers to being active amongst women.

Understanding women’s experience of physical activity has been under-researched. There have been formative research studies that have examined the impact of these messages in experimental small samples. One such study showed that 339 women exposed to TGC depictions of exercise showed improved body satisfaction and physical activity intention compared to controls [37]. Population level barriers to women remain as one possible reason for gender differentials in physical activity; and exploring this was central to the formative research underpinning the TGC-V and the Sport England TGC campaigns [9,10,11].

The TGC-V campaign followed on from the extensive efforts of the Sport England “This Girl Can” campaign. This effort in England was a huge multi-strategy initiative alongside an extensive mass media campaign, aiming to change “how women think and feel about exercise and sport… And the fear of being judged” [10, 11]. No results have been reported in the peer-reviewed literature from this campaign, but Sport England reports suggest high rates of social media visits, high campaign awareness and up to 1.6 million additional women reporting that they initiated some exercise [10, 33]. This latter finding was corroborated by the independent representative Active People surveys, which showed decreases in the gender gap in physical activity coincident with the initial waves of the UK “This Girl Can” campaign [38]. The large increase in media reporting of TGC (UK) were followed by an increase in media reporting in Australia following TGC-V (Supplementary material, figure S1).

In Australia, many campaigns have addressed physical inactivity since the 1970s [39], but few have focused specifically on barriers among women. One recent initiative was the national “Girls Make Your Move” campaign between 2016 and 2018. This campaign targeted adolescent girls aged 12 to 20 years, and results have only been reported in government documents [40], but they did show a reported increase in understanding of information sources for where to be active, and feelings of being judged decreased from 28 to 17%, with no other changes in other attitudes or statements [40].

The TGC-V was the first reported adaptation and replication of the UK TGC messages in a mass-reach campaign. VicHealth initiated TGC-V in 2018, with a multi-year commitment to deliver a communitywide campaign across the state of Victoria. The TGC-V mass media component was strengthened through partnering with sport organisations and the Victorian Department of Sport and Recreation, through the use of community champions and role-models, and by linking to local community physical activity and sporting events.

The strengths of this evaluation are a large sample, with substantial diversity by sociodemographic attributes among the women surveyed. However, the sample was derived from a market research panel, but closely resembled all Victorian women. Psychological and attitude measures used were established and previously validated, although minor adaptations were made to the Theory of Planned Behaviour and Self-Determination Theory scales. Nonetheless, these measures showed good internal consistency. The self-report physical activity measure used here has been validated [26]. A further strength was the inclusion of both independent samples and cohort analyses, and the inclusion of two pre-campaign measures. The study used established and internally consistent measures of attitudes and beliefs and routine measures of campaign recall and awareness. The weaknesses are the modest effect observed, and the lack of a comparison region, although two baselines does provide some internal comparator. Whilst encouraging, these effects need to be monitored over time in subsequent campaign years to assess if further changes in the sense of being judged occurred and whether population changes in physical activity and sport occur among women.

Conclusion

Large scale mass-reach campaigns are an expensive public health investment and need to be carefully evaluated. Previous TGC campaigns in England have only provided government reports of their effects, but they attracted much community interest and support. The VicHealth licencing and adaptation for Australian women was supported by a robust evaluation design and indicated initial positive effects on campaign awareness of the initiative and in a reduction in feelings of being judged by these low-active Victorian women. This provides initial evidence for the use of mass media campaigns to influence community perceptions among women, as a precursor to population behaviour change.

Table 1 Baseline demographic data at the pre-campaign measurement (%). 
Full size table
Table 2 Attitudes, barriers and behaviour change scores before and after the TGC-V campaign in the low-active cohort (n = 818)
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Proportion of initially low active women who reported awareness of the This Girl Can campaign logo, advertisement or both by age, education, country of birth (COB), disability status and whether they care for children (%, among low/inactive, n = 818). (Legend: ** significant differences (P < 0.01)

Full size image
Table 3 Factors associated with any change in physical activity days or feeling judged from baseline 1 to post campaign among low-active women (n = 818)
Full size table

Data availability

The data generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to being owned by VicHealth (Government of Victoria), but are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author. Materials relevant to this campaign are available from the VicHealth website: https://thisgirlcan.com.au/.

References

  1. Organization WH. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world. World Health Organization; 2019.

  2. Sallis JF, Bull F, Guthold R, Heath GW, Inoue S, Kelly P, Oyeyemi AL, Perez LG, Richards J, Hallal PC. Progress in physical activity over the olympic quadrennium. The Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1325–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1· 9 million participants. The lancet global health. 2018;6(10):e1077–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1· 6 million participants. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 2020;4(1):23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalman M, Inchley J, Sigmundova D, Iannotti RJ, Tynjälä JA, Hamrik Z, Haug E, Bucksch J. Secular trends in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in 32 countries from 2002 to 2010: a cross-national perspective. Eur J Public Health. 2015;25(suppl2):37–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown WJ, Mielke GI, Kolbe-Alexander TL. Gender equality in sport for improved public health. Lancet (London England). 2016;388(10051):1257–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sport New Zealand. : New Zealand Women and Girls in Sport and Active Recreation policy. http://sportnzorgnz/media/1549/women-and-girls-govt-strategypdf2018

  8. Sport Ireland.: Sport Ireland Policy on Women in Sport: https://wwwsportirelandie/sites/default/files/2019-11/wis_policypdf2019

  9. Richards L. Can girls play sport? Gender performativity in online responses to Sport England’s This Girl Can campaign. The Palgrave Handbook of Feminism and Sport, Leisure and Physical Education.edn.: Springer; 2018:pp. 757–767.

  10. Sport England. This girl can: Sport Englandʼs Ground breaking campaign-phase one (November 2014 to November 2015). Juntendo Med J. 2017;63(3):170–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sport England. : This Girl Can: campaign results 2019. https://www.sportengland.org/funds-and-campaigns/this-girl-can

  12. Belanger-Gravel A, Cutumisu N, Lagarde F, Laferte M, Gauvin L. Short-term impact of a Multimedia Communication Campaign on Children’s. Phys Activity Beliefs Behav. 2017;1(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Belanger-Gravel AL, Therrien M, Lagarde F, /Gauvin F. The overall awareness and impact of the WIXX Multimedia Communication Campaign, 2012–2016. J Phys Act Health. 2019;16(5):318–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Summary report of the evaluation of the 2016 “Girls Make Your Move” physical activity for young women campaign. In.: Australia Department of Health. Retrieved from https://campaigns. health &#8230

  15. Sauvage-Mar C, Naylor P-J, Higgins JW, VonBuchholz H. Way2Go! Social marketing for girls’ active transportation to school. Prev Med Rep. 2019;14:100828.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Buchthal OV, Doff AL, Hsu LA, Silbanuz A, Heinrich KM, Maddock JE. Avoiding a knowledge gap in a multiethnic statewide social marketing campaign: is cultural tailoring sufficient? J health communication. 2011;16(3):314–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharpe PA, Burroughs EL, Granner ML, Wilcox S, Hutto BE, Bryant CA, Peck L, Pekuri L. Impact of a community-based prevention marketing intervention to promote physical activity among middle-aged women. Health Educ Behav. 2010;37(3):403–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown WJ, Mummery K, Eakin E, Schofield G. 10,000 steps Rockhampton: evaluation of a Whole Community Approach to improving Population levels of physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2006;3(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beaudoin C, Fernandez C, Wall J, Farley T. Promoting healthy eating and physical activity short-term effects of a mass media campaign. Am J Prev Med. 2007 Mar;32(3):217–23.

  20. Craig CL, Cragg SE, Tudor-Locke C, Bauman A. Proximal impact of Canada on the move - the relationship of campaign awareness to pedometer ownership and use. Can J Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique. 2006;97:21–S27.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Long T, Taubenheim AM, Wayman J, Temple S, Ruoff BA. The Heart Truth: using the power of branding and social marketing to increase awareness of heart disease in women. Social Mark Q. 2008;14(3):3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Seal E, Nicholson M, McNeil N, Stukas A, O’Halloran P, Randle E. Fear of judgement and women’s physical (in) activity experiences.International Review for the Sociology of Sport2021:10126902211016631.

  23. Ding D, Mutrie N, Bauman A, Pratt M, Hallal PR, Powell KE. Physical activity guidelines 2020: comprehensive and inclusive recommendations to activate populations. The Lancet. 2020;396(10265):1780–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sport_England. : This Girl Can Sport England Survey https://wwwsurveymonkeycom/r/TGCPartnerSurvey 2015, [accessed June 2022].

  25. Milton K, Bull F, Bauman A. Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure. BJSM online. 2011;45(3):203–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Halloran P, Kingsley M, Nicholson M, Staley K, Randle E, Wright A, Bauman A. Responsiveness of the single item measure to detect change in physical activity.PLoS ONE2020, 15(6 June).

  27. ACSM: American College of Sports Medicine ACSM. Physical Activity Guidelines. https://www.acsmorg/education-resources/trending-topics-resources/physical-activity-guidelines 2022

  28. Marcus BH, Rakowski W, Rossi JS. Assessing motivational readiness and decision making for exercise. Health Psychol. 1992;11(4):257–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sheldon KM, Elliot AJ, Kim Y, Kasser T. What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. J Personal Soc Psychol. 2001;80(2):325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Norman P, Conner M, Bell R. The theory of planned behaviour and exercise: evidence for the moderating role of past behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 2000;5(3):249–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents in Urdan T, Parajres F, editors self efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Inform Age Publishers USA. 2006;5(1):307–37.

  32. Bauman A, Chau J. The role of media in promoting physical activity. J Phys Activity Health. 2009;6(s2):196–S210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sport England. : This Girl Can - campaign summary. https://www.sportengland.org/funds-and-campaigns/this-girl-can 2019.

  34. Brown WJ, Mielke GI, Kolbe-Alexander TL. Gender equality in sport for improved public health. The Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1257–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mielke GI, da Silva ICM, Kolbe-Alexander TL, Brown WJ. Shifting the physical inactivity curve Worldwide by closing the gender gap. Sports Med. 2018;48(2):481–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. DeWolfe CE, Watt MC, Romero-Sanchiz P, Stewart SH. Gender differences in physical activity are partially explained by anxiety sensitivity in post-secondary students. J Am Coll Health. 2020;68(3):219–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mulgrew KE, McCulloch K, Farren E, Prichard I, Lim MS. This girl can# jointhemovement: effectiveness of physical functionality-focused campaigns for women’s body satisfaction and exercise intent. Body image. 2018;24:26–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sport England. : Active Lives Adult Survey November 2018/19 Report wwwsportengland.org 2020, accessed 2022 at: tinyurl.com/3pm4txj2

  39. Grunseit ABB, Goldbaum E, Gale J, Bauman A. Mass mediacampaigns addressing physical activity, nutrition and obesity in Australia: An updated narrative review.The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre2016, https://preventioncentre.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/1606-Mass-media-evidence-review-final.pdf

  40. Orima Research for the Australian Department of Health. 2019 Girls Make your move Campaign Evaluation Research Comprehensive Evaluation report, final. https://campaigns.health.gov.au/girlsmove/resources/publications/report/evaluation-research-report-phase-3-girls-make-your-move

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the staff of the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth) who assisted with and supported the research conducted as part of the evaluation of the This Girl Can campaign, in particular Melanie Fineberg, Kellye Hartman, Cara Busst, Annemarie Wright, Jane Shill, Helen Vatzakis, Shelley White, Chantel Johansen, Alex Dandanis, Jenna Williams, Jasmine Lawang, Clare Anderson, Adam Miller, Stefan Grun and Jerril Rechter. The authors also acknowledge Michael Sparks and Rhys Slattery from Intuitive Solutions for their assistance with the research and evaluation of the This Girl Can campaign.

Funding

The data analysed in this paper is drawn from research conducted as part of the evaluation of the This Girl Can in Victoria, Australia, which was commissioned and funded by the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Sport and Social Impact, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Nicola McNeil, Matthew Nicholson, Paul O’Halloran, Erica Randle & Arthur Stukas

  2. Sydney School of Public Health and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Adrian Bauman

  3. Monash University Malaysia, Kuala, Lumpur, Malaysia

    Matthew Nicholson

  4. Social and Global Studies Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Emma Seal

Authors
  1. Adrian Bauman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicola McNeil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew Nicholson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul O’Halloran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Emma Seal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Erica Randle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Arthur Stukas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors designed the study, MN obtained the data and led the evaluation framework, NM prepared the dataset, AB analysed the data and led drafting of the manuscript, all authors have read and commented on multiple versions and the submitted version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Bauman.

Ethics declarations

Declarations

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval and Consent to Participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All data collection was performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. La Trobe University ethics approval was secured prior to the fieldwork commencing (ref: E17/116).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained for people participating in all surveys, and informed consent was obtained from those in the cohort sample who agreed to be followed up.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bauman, A., McNeil, N., Nicholson, M. et al. Impact of the first year of the “This Girl Can” physical activity and sport mass media campaign in Australia. BMC Public Health 23, 333 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15091-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15091-2

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us