Question of the Month
This month's question is one I suggested be posted on the ACR-GNY blog:
Q: When arbitrators rely on AI to analyze the record—summaries, exhibit identification, or transcript searches—does this constitute “independent research,” and should the parties be given access to the AI outputs to ensure accuracy and fairness?
My response was as follows:
A: When I am unsure about how to decide a disputed factual (or legal) issue, my practice is to request the parties to submit briefs addressing the issues. I am reluctant to rely on AI to ensure I am considering and properly interpreting all relevant exhibits or testimony. If I were to use AI, I would give the parties an opportunity to comment on or supplement the results.
Click here to access the entire discussion.