In Focus
Using Rubrics to Promote Objectivity and Neutrality in Evaluation and Decision-Making
Objectivity and neutrality are important qualities in several of the roles I serve in, including arbitrator, mediator, professor and grant application evaluator. It is also important as an attorney to be able to evaluate your client's case or situation objectively to provide the best advice.
In two of these roles, professor and grant application evaluator, rubrics are used to guide decision-making. Rubrics establish the criteria on which the student submissions or grant applications are to be graded, and the amount of weight to be given to each factor. I find that using rubrics helps me focus on the individual item to be evaluated, and assures fairness and consistency in evaluation the submissions or applications. Grading with rubrics also provides meaningful feedback to the student or applicant, showing where there is room for improvement.
It has been suggested that rubrics can also be helpful in negotiations and mediations to assist the parties in identifying the essential elements and priorities for successful outcomes. I have not yet used rubrics this way, but will look for opportunities to do so. It would be important though, to ensure that the parties remain open to the possibility that other criteria should be included in their rubric, or that the relative weights assigned to the various criteria be adjusted.