In Focus
Reality Testing in Mediation
Often, when parties (and their counsel) come to the table in mediation, they are firmly convinced of the rightness of their positions and the certainty of prevailing in the event the case proceeds to or continues in litigation or arbitration. This may present an obstacle to engaging in meaningful negotiations. Often, though, the outcome is truly in doubt due to contract wording ambiguities, unforeseen events, or failure of the parties to amend their contract as the business transaction may evolve or morph. However, due to confirmation bias, the parties may only recognize or credit the facts that are consistent with their narrative, and reactive devaluation may cause them to discount any contrary information or arguments presented by their adversary.
Thus, the mediator's first job may be to dislodge the parties' conviction in the correctness of their understanding of the situation. The parties may be open to hearing information that is contrary to their convictions when elicited or suggested by a neutral party rather than the adversary. Once the mediator has engaged in some "reality testing", the parties may appreciate there is some risk in pursuing adjudication and may be willing to shift into interest-based negotiations.