ABOUT US
SERVICES
Rising Rates, Proposed Tax Changes and the Case for Municipal Bonds
By: Aimee O'Connor, Senior Consultant, The Wealth Office™
Post-election interest rate volatility may have investors questioning why they hold bonds. The possibility of rising rates along with potential tax code changes has many taxable investors questioning, more specifically, if municipal bonds make sense in their portfolios. The role of fixed income within a well-diversified portfolio remains important and the case for municipal bonds for taxable investors continues to be compelling.

Returns for fixed income investments are comprised of two components: 1) the interest paid to the holder and 2) underlying price of the bond. The price component of return is inversely tied to interest rates. As rates increase, bond prices decline and conversely, bond prices increase when rates fall. While the price movement on fixed income is an important aspect of return, the primary driver of return over time is income. The chart below shows the cumulative return of the Barclays Capital 3-Year Municipal Bond Index and how much of the cumulative return is attributed to price movement of bonds over time.  
Source: Bloomberg 2016

While rising interest rates can cause negative price returns in fixed income over the short-term, the price movement can be partially offset by yields from higher reinvestment rates. Hence, investors with a long-term time horizon will eventually benefit from rising rates as the income component of return increases. While rates move upward from historic lows, short-term price volatility can be expected in fixed income markets; however, the combination of current yields and reinvesting at higher rates will ultimately benefit investors over the long run.  

With a new Administration in office and Republican-controlled Congress, the probability of tax reform is high. After President Donald Trump’s victory, market participants questioned if the tax exemption for municipal bonds would cease to exist. Eliminating the tax-exempt status of municipal bonds has been a topic of conversation historically, but has proved to be an uphill battle and to date, municipal bonds have always maintained their tax-exempt status through the years. President Trump also alluded to the U.S. Conference of Mayors that he supports maintaining the tax-exempt status on municipal bonds.  

One of the main tax reforms still on the table is decreasing the number of individual tax brackets from seven to three and reducing the highest marginal tax rate from 39.6% to 33%. Since individual investors mainly use municipal bonds to reduce their tax burden, if the tax brackets are reduced, municipal bonds become less attractive due to the loss of after-tax value. Even with the proposed tax reduction, municipal bonds still remain relatively attractive in comparison to Treasury bonds today.  

For comparison, we will use the muni/Treasury ratio to show the attractiveness of municipal bonds versus Treasury bonds. The muni/Treasury ratio takes the yield of municipal bonds and divides it by the yield on Treasury bonds. If the yield for municipal bonds and Treasury bonds were equal, the ratio would be 100%, indicating municipal bonds are more attractive given the same pre-tax yield but higher after-tax yield. The below example assumes a tax rate of 39.6% in which Treasuries become more attractive on an after-tax basis when the ratio moves below 60%.
Source: Thomson Reuters Muni/Treasury Ratios

If the top marginal tax rate is reduced to 33% in the following chart, the muni/Treasury ratio would have to decrease to 66% for Treasuries to be more attractive for individual investors.
Source: Thomson Reuters Muni/Treasury Ratios

As of the end of January, the 10-Year muni/Treasury ratio was 95%. Using history as our guide, we can compare the movement in the top marginal tax rate to the muni/Treasury ratio to understand how tax reform has impacted the attractiveness of municipal bonds over time.
Source: Thompson Reuters, IRS.GOV

Even in periods where the top marginal tax rate declined, the muni to Treasury ratio remained stable. The chart above illustrates that the historical attractiveness of municipal bonds has had low correlation with tax rate changes.  

The outlook for bonds is optimistic over the long-term, as investors realize higher yielding bonds through reinvestment. While tax reform and rate hikes by the Federal Reserve might drive short-term volatility in the bond market, maintaining a prudently diversified portfolio remains important for investors. If history is any predictor of the future market, municipal bonds should also remain attractive for taxable investors. Investors should ensure they are properly positioned within their fixed income portfolio and monitor their investments as new tax reforms become available. 

Please contact any of the professionals at DiMeo Schneider & Associates, L.L.C. to discuss the role of fixed income and your overall asset allocation strategy.
While this article addresses generally held investment philosophies of DiMeo Schneider & Associates, L.L.C., it does not represent a specific investment recommendation for any individual client or prospective client. Please consult with your advisor, attorney and accountant, as appropriate, regarding specific advice.
This report is intended for the exclusive use of clients or prospective clients of DiMeo Schneider & Associates, L.L.C. Content is privileged and confidential. Any dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. Information has been obtained from a variety of sources believed to be reliable though not independently verified. Any forecasts represent median expectations and actual returns, volatilities and correlations will differ from forecasts. Past performance does not indicate future performance.  
Schedule an Appointment
Or Call 800.392.9998
Learn More About Us
Or View our Research
500 West Madison Street, Suite 1700
Chicago, IL 60661-4593

Phone 800.392.9998 | 312.853.1000 | www.dimeoschneider.com
Subscribe to our email list.