Subscribe to our email list
LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email Contact Card
Compensation in Context Newsletter
VERITAS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CONSULTANTS
San Francisco
    Chicago
    New York
    Washington D.C
415-618-6060
www.veritasecc.com

Strategies for Creating More Deductible Compensation Under the “New” Sec. 162(m)


September 17, 2018


Thanks to Michael Melbinger


Most companies will want to consider changes to the design of their executive compensation programs to preserve the deductibility of compensation in light of the dramatic changes to Code Sec. 162(m) wrought by the TCJA. Before making changes, however, most of us were waiting for clarification on the extent to which IRS guidance would allow companies to continue to deduct pre-2018 awards, payments, and benefits under the grandfathered provisions of Sec. 162(m) as they applied before 2018. 
Now, just in time for the beginning of proxy and compensation review season, we have that guidance in the form of Notice 2018-68. I have discussed possible strategies for converting more of an executive’s compensation to deductible, from non-deductible, under “new” Sec. 162(m), in several previous blogs. Today, I point out one more possibility.
Two different sections of the regulations under Code Sec. 409A provide an exception to the prohibition on delaying or deferring payments and allow a company to decide to defer the payment of compensation to an executive, without an election in advance, if the compensation is not deductible under Code Sec. 162(m). In each case, however, the deferred payment must be made as soon as reasonably practicable following the first date on which the company anticipates that its deduction with respect to such payment will no longer be limited by the application of Sec. 162(m). The new “once a covered employee, always a covered employee” rule will complicate some companies’ ability to utilize these exceptions, but should not eliminate them.
The exception for further deferral of payments that otherwise would qualify for the short-term deferral exception, also seems to require an element of surprise on the part of the company. This exception requires that the company establish that “as of the date the legally binding right to the payment arose, a reasonable person would not have anticipated the application of section 162(m) at the time of the payment.” Therefore, this exception may only be useful for future payments that were promised before November 2, 2017, but not grandfathered. However, every little bit helps.
    Veritas Executive Compensation Consultants, ("Veritas") is a truly independent executive compensation consulting firm.

    We are independently owned, and have no entangling relationships that may create potential conflict of interest scenarios, or may attract the unwanted scrutiny of regulators, shareholders, the media, or create public outcry. Veritas goes above and beyond to provide unbiased executive compensation counsel. Since we are independently owned, we do our job with utmost objectivity - without any entangling business relationships.

    Following stringent best practice guidelines, Veritas works directly with boards and compensation committees, while maintaining outstanding levels of appropriate communication with senior management. Veritas promises no compromises in presenting the innovative solutions at your command in the complicated arena of executive compensation.

    We deliver the advice that you need to hear, with unprecedented levels of responsive client service and attention.

    Visit us online at www.veritasecc.com, or contact our CEO Frank Glassner personally via phone at (415) 618-6060, or via email at fglassner@veritasecc.com. He'll gladly answer any questions you might have.

    For your convenience, please click here for Mr. Glassner's contact data, and click here for his bio.
    VERITAS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CONSULTANTS
    powered by emma