As the human tragedy of the COVID-19 virus spreads and everyday life
As the human tragedy of the COVID-19 virus spreads and everyday life
LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email Contact Card
Compensation in Context Newsletter
VERITAS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CONSULTANTS
San Francisco
    Chicago
    New York
    Washington D.C
415-618-6060
www.veritasecc.com

Does ESG Matter Amidst a Global Crisis?


Share This Email:
Share via Email Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn


July 1, 2020 | Sustainable Governance Partners LLC


As the human tragedy of the COVID-19 virus spreads and everyday life radically transforms, companies are asking whether “long-termism” and sustainability matter right now. After all, companies are considering worker layoffs, whether they can service debt payments, and how to regain revenue streams that have dried up overnight. At the same time, investors are liquidating assets across the board, reallocating toward cash and driving even traditional ‘safe-haven’ investments downward while volatility spikes. Do investors still care about ESG? And can public companies afford to allocate capital – human, intellectual, financial or otherwise – to things like ESG?
The better question, albeit a tough one, is whether they can afford not to.
Importantly, an issuer’s major long-term shareholders – index fund managers, ETF providers, and active managers who take a multi-year view -- continue to expect good governance, seeing it as inextricably linked with crisis management. In response to questions about whether the coronavirus crisis would affect their priorities and proxy voting practices, Michelle Edkins, global head of BlackRock’s investment stewardship team, said “we are looking at these long-term. These are not new issues… In times of crisis that becomes more apparent, not less apparent.”
In addition, these times of crisis are exactly when companies and their boards capture the value of strategic sustainability planning and a grounding in long-term corporate purpose. Here are a few priorities that should remain front of mind for every company:
Role of the board, and its relationship with management. In times of great uncertainty, the role of the board of directors as a strategic asset is most valuable. Executives should be leveraging the unique experiences and broad set of perspectives that their directors bring and harnessing the power of that cognitive diversity toward the end of better decision-making. Through a robust set of crisis management processes – such as risk mapping, supply chain management, “tabletop” crisis simulation exercises, and a track record of internal debate -- well-governed companies have a better sense of who does what, have built trust and rapport, and are positioned to respond rapidly to the unexpected.
Human capital management. The human toll of the coronavirus goes well beyond health and safety, as the world anticipates widespread layoffs, sick leaves, and sustained unemployment. Many companies identify their employees as their greatest asset; however, they must also acknowledge that employee wages may be a recurring expense without commensurate near-term revenue. Investors will want to understand how companies address the tradeoffs between near-term margin degradation and long-term work force preservation; how they think about the crisis’ economic impact on the welfare of their workers; and how they can preserve their ability to attract and retain employees in the future. These are difficult circumstances, and each company will have to evaluate these tradeoffs within the context of its own sustainable business strategy.
    Frank Glassner weekly newsletter Compensation in Context on CEO Pay
    Capital allocation. Companies now face massive short-term liquidity pressures, as well as criticism from politicians and others targeted at past stock buybacks and borrowings. In the best of times, because their own time horizons differ, shareholders hold a wide range of views on how the company should deploy and return capital. There is no one size fits all solution; but balancing the tradeoffs between short-term financial needs and long-term strategic priorities – and explaining this balance to investors and other stakeholders – will only grow in importance.
    Climate change. Prior to the current crisis, many institutional investors identified climate change as the top risk facing their portfolios. This issue has not gone away, and reports released in the last several months have raised estimates of the future impact as well as the divide between our current trajectory and that needed to prevent a climate catastrophe. Moreover, dynamics related to COVID 19 – such as short-term decreases in emissions, the unprecedented volatility in oil prices (due, in part to the Saudi-Russian price war), and the changing political landscape – will require companies to reassess and adjust their climate strategies.
    Vulnerability to activists. Several market observers have predicted that the coronavirus crisis may slow activist involvement in the near term, as activist investors pause to absorb the market volatility and other uncertainties. Yet companies looking beyond the next several months should be wary of a future heightened risk of proxy fights. In fact, the financial crisis of 2009 saw proxy fights spike to a record high, suggesting that bear markets expose more companies to attacks and investor rebellion.
    Social license to operate. Underlying these issues is the fact that modern companies must respond to a broad set of stakeholders who look not just to their governments but also to public companies, in times of crisis. How a company responds – in terms of worker treatment, executive pay, product delivery, and myriad other issues – will dictate how consumers, employees, regulators, and investors view that company for years to come.
    No one could have predicted the COVID-19 crisis, and no one yet knows its full impact. What is predictable is that such black swan events do occur and will occur again. Most importantly, in times of acute challenge, long-term investors are looking for companies – and their boards – to be positioned for the long haul. As such, it is essential that companies have the sustainability strategy and the governance structure in place to ensure that they survive each crisis and are poised to thrive on the other side.
      Veritas Executive Compensation Consultants, ("Veritas") is a truly independent executive compensation consulting firm.

      We are independently owned, and have no entangling relationships that may create potential conflict of interest scenarios, or may attract the unwanted scrutiny of regulators, shareholders, the media, or create public outcry. Veritas goes above and beyond to provide unbiased executive compensation counsel. Since we are independently owned, we do our job with utmost objectivity - without any entangling business relationships.

      Following stringent best practice guidelines, Veritas works directly with boards and compensation committees, while maintaining outstanding levels of appropriate communication with senior management. Veritas promises no compromises in presenting the innovative solutions at your command in the complicated arena of executive compensation.

      We deliver the advice that you need to hear, with unprecedented levels of responsive client service and attention.

      Visit us online at www.veritasecc.com, or contact our CEO Frank Glassner personally via phone at (415) 618-6060, or via email at fglassner@veritasecc.com. He'll gladly answer any questions you might have.

      For your convenience, please click here for Mr. Glassner's contact data, and click here for his bio.
      VERITAS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CONSULTANTS
      powered by emma
      Subscribe to our email list.