A monthly update of the scholarly activities of the Pitt Law faculty
A monthly update of the scholarly activities of the Pitt Law faculty
PittLaw Faculty | News & Events | Contact Us
Faculty Impact                                                          February 2015

PUBLICATIONS

David Thaw Publishes in Duke Law & Technology Review

Professor David Thaw published “Reasonable Expectations of Privacy Settings: Social Media and the Stored Communications Act” in Volume 13 of  Duke Law and Technology Review with Professor Christopher J. Borchert of the University of Connecticut School of Law and Professor Fernando M. Pinguelo of Seton Hall University School of Law.
In 1986, Congress passed the Stored Communications Act (SCA) to provide additional protections for individuals’ private communications content held in electronic storage by third parties. Acting out of direct concern for the implications of the Third-Party Records Doctrine—a judicially created doctrine that generally eliminates Fourth Amendment protections for information entrusted to third parties—Congress sought to tailor the SCA to electronic communications sent via and stored by third parties. Yet, because Congress crafted the SCA with language specific to the technology of 1986, courts today have struggled to apply the SCA consistently with regard to similar private content sent using different technologies. The article argues that Congress should revisit the SCA and adopt a single, technology-neutral standard of protection for private communications content held by third-party service providers. Read more

OTHER FACULTY PUBLICATIONS

Publication
Sheila I. Velez Martinez, Remittances from Puerto Rico: Unsuspected Transnational Locality in Times of Crisis, 5 Journal of Race, Gender, and Poverty 71 (2014). (SSRN
Book Chapter
Ann Sinsheimer, Teresa Brostoff, and Nancy Burkoff, "Understanding and Using Legal Rules," in Ann Sinsheimer, Teresa Kissane Brostoff, and Nancy M. Burkoff, eds., Legal Writing: A Contemporary Approach, West Academic Publishing, 2014. (SSRN)
Other
John Burkoff, Search Warrant Law Deskbook two-volume treatise (2015), also available in the Treatises database on WESTLAW, identifier: SRCHWARLAW. (Website)
David Garrow, Toward a Definitive History of Griggs v. Duke Power Company, 67 Vanderbilt Law Review 197 (2014), reprinted in Steven Saltzman, ed., Civil Rights Litigation and Attorney Fees Annual Handbook Vol. 30, Thomson Reuters, 2014, p. 247. (SSRN)

PRESENTATIONS

Ronald Brand Speaks at University of North Carolina U.S./International Law Symposium

Professor Ronald Brand spoke on “Understanding Judgments Recognition” at the North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation symposium, The Changing Relationship Between International Law and U.S. Law. Brand’s talk was followed by comments on his paper by Professor Ralf Michaels of Duke Law School and Professor John Coyle of the University of North Carolina School of Law.
Brand’s presentation traced recent developments in judgments recognition law in the United States, the European Union, and internationally. He considered problems of proximity of place and time that he postulates have skewed the understanding and analysis of current judgments recognition law in the United States. Brand also argued that these problems affect how the international negotiations on a global convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are approached at the Hague Conference on Private International Law. Papers from the conference will be published in the North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation. Read more

OTHER FACULTY PRESENTATIONS

John Cerone traveled to Israel and the Palestinian territories to speak at a closed-door expert meeting. Convened by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency and the Norwegian Refugee Council, the purpose was to advise on the international law of armed conflict, international human rights law, and legal implications of recent treaty actions by the Palestinian authorities in relation to the Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Anthony Infanti conducted a CLE program with attorney Kathleen Schneider for the Allegheny Couty Bar Association Probate and Trust Law Section titled “Surveying the Legal Landscape for Same Sex Couples in Pennsylvania.”

FACULTY FEATURE

In this debut installment of Faculty Features, a new series of monthly videos highlighting Pitt Law faculty members on items of current legal interest within their areas of expertise, Professor Harry Flechtner offers a tribute to the important contributions of the late Professor and Dean John E. Murray Jr., who passed away on February 11, 2015. View video

AWARDS

Dean William M. Carter is Named to 2015 Power List

Dean William M. Carter Jr. has been named to the 2015 Power List of the media firm Lawyers Of Color. The distinction honors the nation’s most influential minority attorneys and nonminority diversity advocates who have made significant contributions to the legal profession. 
This is the second consecutive year Carter has received this distinction. He will be recognized at the 2015 Power List Awards Reception in Washington, D.C., on March 18. Carter also will be profiled with other honorees from across the nation in Lawyers Of Color’s forthcoming publication Power Issue 2015. Carter has served as the dean of Pitt’s School of Law since July 2012. Under his leadership, the law school has consistently been ranked as one of the nation’s upper-tier law programs. Read more

IN THE NEWS 

Alan Meisel is Quoted in New York Times Article on Complexities of End-of-Life Decision Making

Professor Alan Meisel, an expert on end-of-life decision making, was quoted in a January 19 New York Times article “Complexities of Choosing an End Game for Dementia” on whether patients who develop dementia can indicate with an advance directive whether they choose to end their lives through voluntarily stopping eating and drinking (VSED). He believes VSED could be among the viable options for people making these decisions. “People in their 50s and 60s frequently say: ‘I don’t want to be in that situation. I don’t want to put my family in that situation.’ And people will increasingly voice those views to others, sometimes in a formal way through advance directives.” Meisel stressed the importance of not referring to this method of end-of-life care as “starvation,” saying, “It’s the rhetoric more than anything.” He added that if removing patients from ventilators were suddenly referred to as “suffocation,” that issue might also become contentious. Read more
Follow the Pitt Law Faculty on Facebook and Twitter!
PittLaw
Facebook Twitter YouTube flickr
powered by emma
Subscribe to our email list.