Hybrid Strategy (Donor-Advised Fund + Private Foundation)
Because both donor-advised funds and private foundations have certain unique advantages, some donors may benefit from a hybrid approach that utilizes both.
Given the 5% annual distribution requirement for private foundations, the donor may be reluctant to make the 5% annual distribution in years with poor investment returns; in this case, the donor might choose to meet the annual distribution requirement by gifting a portion to various recipients with the remainder donated to a “sister” donor-advised fund. In doing so, the donor meets the foundation’s 5% distribution requirement while effectively distributing less than 5% by retaining assets in the “sister” donor-advised fund for future giving (the donor-advised fund does not have an annual distribution requirement).
For example, a private family foundation of $5 million faces a minimum required distribution of $250,000 for the year. In a particular year, the foundation portfolio declines -10% and therefore, the donor prefers to avoid the required $250,000 distribution. The donor elects to gift $100,000 from the foundation to various charities and $150,000 to the “sister” donor-advised fund. The donation to the donor-advised fund ($150,000) is retained for future charitable giving. Special Note: a private foundation is allowed to make gifts to a donor-advised fund, but a donor-advised fund cannot make gifts to a private foundation; such transfers are a “one-way street.”
The hybrid approach may also be effective if the AGI limits for charitable deductions would make a difference in a given tax year for charitable contributions to the private foundation versus the donor-advised fund. Additionally, if the donor wanted to make grants anonymously, the foundation could make a grant to the donor-advised fund, and the donor-advised fund could then make the grant anonymously.
Benefits of the Hybrid Approach
• Greater flexibility in meeting the private foundation’s annual distribution requirements
• Greater flexibility in tax planning (charitable deductibility)
• Greater flexibility in making grants anonymously