Program Review and Preliminary Classifications
Following the submission of program self-studies in December, academic leaders reviewed all Program Vitality Reports (PVRs). Each dean served as the primary reviewer for their own school's or college's programs and as a secondary reviewer for programs from another school/college. PVRs were also reviewed by the provost, vice provost for academic budget and planning, and vice president for research & graduate studies.
We want to acknowledge the substantial work that programs put into these self-studies. The qualitative information you provided gave necessary context for the quantitative data and has been essential in helping us understand each program's unique contributions, strengths, and challenges.
Programs were evaluated using five evidence domains: student success, market demand, financial performance, mission alignment, and organizational viability. Based on this review, each dean prepared initial ideas for classifying programs using four categories: sunset, revitalize, sustain, and grow.
The Deans' Council, which includes all deans, the provost, and the vice provost for academic budget and planning and the interim executive director of University Studies met December 17-18 to conduct a collaborative review of our academic portfolio. Each dean presented their initial classification ideas, and through discussion with secondary reviewers and the full council, some classifications were adjusted, others were reinforced, and all benefited from broader input.
Following the group meetings, each dean met separately with the provost and the vice provost for academic budget and planning to address additional questions, clarify ideas for classifications and budget scenarios, and discuss communication plans with their chairs and programs.
Now: Sharing Preliminary Classifications and Gathering Feedback
Deans have begun to share their preliminary classifications with their units and gather feedback. The provost's office is now developing financial models to understand the potential revenue impact, projected savings, and transitional costs of possible actions.
The provost continues to provide regular updates on progress at the bi-weekly Faculty Senate Budget Committee meetings, the President’s Executive Council, as well as with the full Faculty Senate.
Next: Final Classifications and Implementation Planning
By Feb. 2, deans will submit final classifications to the provost after incorporating feedback from units. The classifications may still be adjusted based on this feedback and financial modeling.
Later in February, final classifications will be reviewed by the provost and president, approved and integrated into budget planning.