ABOUT US
SERVICES
Non-Discrimination Testing
By: Ryan Walter, Consultant
The IRS tasks Plan Sponsors with ensuring traditional 401(k) plan contributions, by and for non-highly compensated employees (NHCEs), are proportional to contributions made by and for highly-compensated employees (HCEs).  

A HCE is defined as any employee who:

• Was a five percent owner, directly or by family attribution (spouse, child, grandparent or parent of someone who is a five percent owner) at any time during the current or previous year.

• In the previous year, was paid more than $125,000 by their employer (for 2019 subject to cost-of-living adjustments in later years), and, if the employer elects, was in the top 20 percent group of paid employees.

This required proportionality between NHCEs and HCEs is ensured through Non-Discrimination Testing comprised of Actual Contribution Percentage (ACP) and Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) tests. 

The ADP test takes into account participants’ elective deferrals, both pre-tax and Roth. Dividing a participant’s elective deferrals by the participant’s compensation provides the participant’s Actual Deferral Ratio (ADR). The average ADR for all eligible participants in the NHCE as well as HCE group is the ADP for each respective group.

The ACP is calculated the same way except it uses the participant’s matching and any after-tax (non-Roth) contributions. Neither the ADP or ACP tests includes catch-up contributions. See example below.

In the example above, Jim Smith would be the only HCE, so the ADP would be 10 percent, and the ACP would be three percent ($5,400/$180,000) for the HCE group. The three remaining employees would be classified as NHCEs (assuming no five percent ownership). Their ADP is three percent, and their ACP is one-and-a-half percent.

The ADP test is passed if the ADP for the eligible HCEs does not exceed the greater of:
• 125 percent of the ADP for the group of NHCEs, or the lesser of
• 200 percent of the ADP for the group of NHCEs, or
• The ADP for the NHCEs plus two percent


The test above is also performed for the ACP Test, substituting the ACP for the ADP. In the example above, the ADP test fails 10 percent (HCEs) vs. three percent (NHCEs), while the ACP test just passes three percent HCEs vs. one-and-a-half percent NHCEs. Corrective action would have to be taken for the ADP test failure within the statutory correction period. This is generally accomplished by returning excess contributions to those in the HCE group to bring the ADP test up to passing status. When outside of the statutory correction period, possible corrective action requires the employer to make Qualified Non-Elective Contributions (QNEC) to all eligible NHCEs to bring the NHCE groups’ ADP/ACP within test passing parameters.

Plan sponsors should be aware of multiple factors when it comes to Non-Discrimination Testing failures. They include:

• Plan sponsors can use either the current year or prior year contribution method when calculating ADP and ACP figures. This needs to be specified in the plan document.

• The method chosen (prior or current year) can be changed under limited circumstances. Plans can always change from prior year to current year, but a plan can only change once from current to prior year in a five-year period.

• The benefit of using the prior year method is it defines the acceptable level of HCE contributions, can be communicated to those HCEs in advance. 

• Moving from prior to current year method does not guarantee the plan will pass, as averages could still be outside of the allowable range under the current year method.

• All eligible employees need to be included in both ADP and ACP tests, including those that don’t contribute, or were terminated before the end of the year. 


One way to avoid non-discrimination testing all together is to establish a Safe Harbor 401(k) plan, which exempts the plan from ADP and ACP test requirements if certain conditions are met. The conditions to note are specified matching formulas, as well as vesting requirements. Another way plan sponsors can combat testing failures is through plan design. 

Plan sponsors can look at ways to improve the savings rates of NHCE through enhancements to automatic enrollment, automatic escalation, as well as thoughtful participant communication and education. 

Finally, plan sponsors should pay attention to the SECURE Act, that recently passed in the House of Representatives and is now headed for the Senate. It addresses retirement plans and could potentially affect conditions that would qualify a plan for Safe Harbor. 

For further information, please contact your Consultant at DiMeo Schneider & Associates, L.L.C.
 

While this article addresses generally held investment philosophies of DiMeo Schneider & Associates, L.L.C., it does not represent a specific investment recommendation for any individual client or prospective client. Please consult with your advisor, attorney and accountant, as appropriate, regarding specific advice. Information has been obtained from a variety of sources believed to be reliable but not independently verified. Past performance does not indicate future performance.

This report is intended for the exclusive use of clients or prospective clients of DiMeo Schneider & Associates, L.L.C. Content is privileged and confidential. Any dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited.  
Schedule an Appointment
Or Call 800.392.9998
Learn More About Us
Or View our Research
Chicago | Austin | Washington, DC | Boston
800.392.9998 | 312.853.1000
www.dimeoschneider.com
Subscribe to our email list.