Case On Point
Carlson v Colangelo
(N.Y. Ct. Of App. 2025)
Intergenerational wealth transfers through gifts, wills and trust often spark family conflict among family members. To deter such conflict, the individual making the will or trust can include an in terrorem clause disinheriting any beneficiary who challenges the terms of the instrument.
Sometimes, though, the conflict is not about the terms of the will or trust, but whether the trustee or executor is faithfully carrying out their duties under the instrument. That was the situation in Carlson v Colangelo. Defendant trustee informed plaintiff beneficiary that the trust set up by the decedent did not have sufficient funds to make certain payments specified in the trust instrument. The trustee took the position that the language of the trust gave her discretion not to make those payments. Plaintiff sued, seeking a court order compelling defendant trustee to make the payments. Defendant contended the filing of the suit triggered the application of the in terrorem clause, disinheriting plaintiff. Defendant prevailed in the lower courts, but New York's Court of Appeals reversed, holding:
"The purpose of the in terrorem clause is to discourage challenges to the Trust that would upset the grantor's distributive intent. An action like plaintiff's, meant to require the Trustee to distribute the Trust in accordance with its stated provisions, is not a challenge to the grantor's distributive plan.Indeed, it would be contrary to the grantor's intent to hold that a party cannot file an action to receive exactly that which the grantor set aside for transfer to their named beneficiary."
___________________________________________________________________________________________________