Subscribe to our email list
LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email Contact Card
Compensation in Context Newsletter
VERITAS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CONSULTANTS
San Francisco
    Chicago
    New York
    Washington D.C
415-618-6060
www.veritasecc.com

Summary Compensation Table: Why Are You Reporting Dividends as “Other Income”?


March 11, 2019


Thanks to our friend Broc Romanek


Broc Romanek recently noted and wondered why some companies were reporting dividends in the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) of their Compensation and Discussion section of their proxy statements.
It was noted that if a company reports the fair market value of an award in the SCT, any subsequent dividends that are paid on the shares (whether prior to – or at – the vesting date) are not reported as compensation expense in the financials (provided the underlying shares vest). And therefore, dividends do not need to be reported in the SCT.
If dividends are paid on a current basis and the shares are subsequently forfeited, those dividends are charged to earnings and would be required to be reported in the SCT. Because paying dividends on unvested shares is considered an “egregious compensation practice” by most governance based shareholders and their proxy advisors, most companies accrue the dividends and only pay them when the shares vest, thus the reporting of dividends should be rare (if ever). The fact the dividends are treated as taxable income has no bearing on the accounting or proxy disclosure.
For support, here is the relevant FASB accounting standard:
Paragraph B93 in the Basis of Conclusions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Statement 123 (revised) – Share-Based Payment states the following:
The fair value of a share of stock in concept equals the present value of the expected future cash flows to the stockholder, which includes dividends. Therefore, additional compensation does not arise from dividends on non-vested shares that eventually vest. Because the measure of compensation cost for those shares is their fair value at the grant date, recognizing dividends on non-vested shares as additional compensation would effectively double count those dividends. For the same reason, if employees do not receive dividends declared on the class of shares granted to them until the shares vest, the grant-date fair value of the award is measured by reducing the share price at that date by the present value of the dividends expected to be paid on the shares during the requisite service period, discounted at the appropriate risk-free interest rate.
    Veritas Executive Compensation Consultants, ("Veritas") is a truly independent executive compensation consulting firm.

    We are independently owned, and have no entangling relationships that may create potential conflict of interest scenarios, or may attract the unwanted scrutiny of regulators, shareholders, the media, or create public outcry. Veritas goes above and beyond to provide unbiased executive compensation counsel. Since we are independently owned, we do our job with utmost objectivity - without any entangling business relationships.

    Following stringent best practice guidelines, Veritas works directly with boards and compensation committees, while maintaining outstanding levels of appropriate communication with senior management. Veritas promises no compromises in presenting the innovative solutions at your command in the complicated arena of executive compensation.

    We deliver the advice that you need to hear, with unprecedented levels of responsive client service and attention.

    Visit us online at www.veritasecc.com, or contact our CEO Frank Glassner personally via phone at (415) 618-6060, or via email at fglassner@veritasecc.com. He'll gladly answer any questions you might have.

    For your convenience, please click here for Mr. Glassner's contact data, and click here for his bio.
    VERITAS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CONSULTANTS
    powered by emma