Federal law provides a maximum of 60 months assistance, but allows states to determine their own max. This bill:
- Reduces the max to 36 months.
- Changes the Child Care Assistance Program: provides assistance for families up to 185% of federal poverty for 24 months per adult, so if you’re married, you get twice as much child care time, but only one parent can be in school.
- Provides Food Assistance up to 130% of federal poverty.
In these times, I am reminded of Matthew 25:37-40: ‘Master, what are you talking about? When did we ever see you hungry and feed you, thirsty and give you a drink? And when did we ever see you sick or in prison and come to you?’ Then the King will say, ‘I’m telling the solemn truth: Whenever you did one of these things to someone overlooked or ignored, that was me—you did it to me.’
One of the reasons I voted against this bill, which is called the HOPE Act, is that several social service agencies opposed it, including United Consumer Services of Johnson County, Kansas Action for Children and Harvesters. They said it would make it more difficult for families facing difficulties to get the help they need. Another reason for my NO vote is that the bill was rushed through the House after the Senate spent a great deal of time on it, including six hours of debate on the Senate floor. House members received the conference committee report on HB 2258 just an hour before meeting to vote on it. We were unable to amend it, only vote it up or down, after having little time to study the bill. This is one of several things about how the legislative process is being handled this session that left a bad taste in my mouth as I left Topeka after first adjournment.
Motions to Concur or Nonconcur
To convene a conference committee, the House must vote to concur or nonconcur on the Senate’s changes. The House nonconcurred and asked conference committees be appointed for the following bills:
Sub HB 2159 would allow offenders to request expungement of a first-time DUI violation five years (rather than 10 years) after the sentence or diversion is served, and 10 years after a 2nd or subsequent conviction. The bill also establishes a restricted driver’s license which would allow convicted drivers to drive a car with ignition interlock. This will help DUI offenders maintain transportation to jobs. It appears that limiting records on DUI offenses might put us out of compliance with the federal law and could cost $8.2 million in federal highway funds.
The “seclusion and restraint bill” (S Sub 2170) has been quite controversial and is an example of legislating for everyone because of a handful of bad actors. The bill defines Emergency Safety Intervention (ESI) and details cases where it is to be used and documented, establishes a parent complaint process and an ESI Task Force. Originally, the bill applied only to students with disabilities, but now covers all students. The Senate made major, critical changes to the bill, including removing the ability for use of physical restraint when a student is involved in an altercation. This bill needs more work.
HB 2055 would provide guidance for sentencing offenders with a background in out-of-state offenses which might not match Kansas offenses in an apples-to-apples way. The bill also includes Mija Stockman’s Law, which creates the crime of aggravated battery when someone is greatly harmed or disfigured by someone driving under the influence.
The Senate gutted a bill providing employment protections for the National Guard in the case of domestic deployment, and inserted the fantasy sports league, charity raffle, and bingo bills into one “omnibus gaming” bill (Senate Substitute for HB 2155).