Budget
The House has not been given an opportunity to vote on a budget yet, which means that issue will be left to deal with when the Legislature returns to Topeka in May. So far, the Senate has passed a Budget Bill that was put into the shell of a House Bill. Sending the Senate Substitute for a House Bill over to the House side means the House cannot amend the bill but only vote it UP or DOWN. Our House Appropriations Committee has worked hard on a budget, but unfortunately, it looks as if their work is just going to be ignored
I am deeply concerned about what we’ve seen so far in budget proposals from the Governor and the Senate:
- Has the state spending more than it’s bringing in – to the tune of $224 million in deficit spending this year alone
- Sweeps money from every account they could find – including the highway fund
Kansas has never stood for deficit spending and we should not let it happen now.
Taxes
To pay for our budget requirements we must have revenue. The tax laws passed by the Governor in 2012 have created $650 million shortfall in the state budget. In spite of the evidence, the Speaker of the House still maintains that we have a SPENDING problem, not a REVENUE problem. Our consensus revenue report for March showed an $11 million shortfall. The evidence continues to pour in!
As we look at options to fund our budget, I support a move back to some income tax in Kansas to maintain a balanced approach to revenue. The Governor stands firmly opposed to making any changes to income tax and instead has put forward the following options to consider:
- Increasing the gas tax so we all have to pay more at the pump
- Increasing taxes on cigarettes and alcohol by $130 million
- Hiking up sales taxes so we’d pay more on groceries and everything else we buy
- Putting a $106 million tax on health insurance policies
- Changing the agricultural land valuation so Kansas farmers have to pay higher property taxes
- Eliminating sales tax exemptions, including the exemption on farm machiner
- Increasing our property taxes by eliminating the homestead exemption or increasing the state mill levy by another 10 mills
While keeping income taxes down is important, we must find the right balance because what we’re doing now isn’t working. In District 21 the taxpayers have stressed to me that high property taxes are their biggest concern. At this point in time, the only tax change in the above list that I fully support is a tobacco tax, and that stems from the tremendous influence a tax increase has on reducing tobacco use, thus reducing our medical costs.
KPERS (SB 228)
Last year before the election, the Governor and the rest of the legislature stood proud that we had increased funding to the Kansas Public Employee Retirement System (KPERS). As soon as the tax plan was failing, the Governor pulled that money out. SB 228 calls for the borrowing of $1 billion for bonds to cover some of the shortfall going to KPERS, allowing the state to use money in the State General Fund instead. Essentially, we maxed out one credit card and now have a new one at a lower interest rate to cover the debts of the original card.
The bill passed in the House by 63 votes, the minimum number required to pass a bill. I voted NO. I was taught that to be fiscally responsible you do NOT BORROW MONEY to cover your debts! The borrowing of money from our state retirement plan must end. I am amazed that a Republican legislature does not face needs to face this responsibility head-on. The legislature should own up to the fact that they haven’t been paying into KPERS like they should have. Racking up more debt and passing the buck onto the next generation is Washington-style politics, and I do NOT support it!
Gun Rights (SB 45)
While I strongly support the Second Amendment, I do not support allowing guns to be carried without any training at our parks, on our playgrounds, and at local bars and restaurants. While maintaining the right to carry a gun, I strongly support minimal training for those who carry a concealed weapon in public: thus my NO vote on SB 45. The Governor has signed this bill into law.
Outlook for Veto Session
The Legislature has two issues it needs to tackle in May:
- School funding based on how the court responds to the new block grant law
- The budget shortfall combined with the taxes needed to pay for it
My hope continues to be that we’ll see a thoughtful and transparent legislature work TOGETHER to solve these significant issues. As always, it is a pleasure and privilege to serve you. Contact me at barbarabollier@gmail.com as needed during our April break.