Share this:
http://psychology.uchicago.edu/
December 2015
In Press: Recent Graduate Student Publications 
Studies have shown that natural environments can enhance health. A new study led by graduate student Omid Kardan and Professor Marc Berman built upon that work by examining the associations between comprehensive greenspace metrics and health. The study focused on a large urban population center (Toronto, Canada) and related the two domains by combining high-resolution satellite imagery and individual tree data from Toronto with questionnaire-based self-reports of general health perception, cardio-metabolic conditions and mental illnesses from the Ontario Health Study.
Results from the analyses, published in Scientific Reports, suggest that people who live in neighborhoods with a higher density of trees on their streets report significantly higher health perception and significantly fewer cardio-metabolic conditions (controlling for socio-economic and demographic factors). More specifically, having 10 more trees in a city block, on average, was related to improved health perception in ways comparable to an increase in annual personal income of $10,000 and moving to a neighborhood with $10,000 higher median income or being 7 years younger. In addition, having 11 more trees in a city block, on average, was related to decreases cardio-metabolic conditions in ways comparable to an increase in annual personal income of $20,000 and moving to a neighborhood with $20,000 higher median income or being 1.4 years younger.  Results from the study, though correlational, provide preliminary evidence for the importance and independent effect of trees on subjective and objective health.  This study was funded in part by a private foundation grant from the TFK Foundation and an internal grant from the University of Chicago.
Recent research by doctoral students Samantha Fan and Zoe Liberman in collaboration with Dr. Boaz Keysar and Dr. Katherine Kinzler investigated the impact of exposure to a diverse linguistic environment on early social communication. Much of Dr. Keysar’s work focuses on the difficulty of communication: people tend to be egocentric and overconfident in their communicative abilities. Here, the research team asked whether being regularly exposed to multiple languages influences communicative development.
Their findings, published in Psychological Science, show that children raised in a multilingual social environment have extensive practice with linguistic perspective-taking: they must track who speaks each language, and who can understand which content. These social experiences may lead to enhanced communication. Thus, children raised in monolingual and multilingual environments were tested on a social communication task that required taking an experimenter’s visual perspective in order to interpret her intended meaning. Monolingual children failed to take the speaker’s perspective dramatically more often than children who were exposed to a multilingual environment. Children who were merely exposed regularly to a second language, but only spoke English themselves, performed as well as bilingual children, despite having lower executive-function scores. Thus, this research suggests that communicative advantages do not require speaking multiple languages, and are likely social in origin, rather than due to cognitive differences. For millennia, multilingual exposure has been the norm. This study shows that this type of linguistic environment may facilitate the development of perspective-taking tools that enhance communication skills. 
For the past two and a half years, graduate students Talia Berkowitz and Marjorie Schaeffer have been collaborating on the Bedtime Learning Together (BLT) project, funded by an Overdeck Family Foundation grant to Drs. Susan Levine and Sian Beilock.  This project aims to evaluate whether parent-child interaction around fun and interesting math problems results in positive changes in children’s’ math learning and math attitudes compared to a reading control group. The project, which is currently in Year 3, is following over 750 students in the Chicago area from preschool through 5th grade.
Their findings from Year 1 of the study, which have recently been published in Science, show that children who use the math app more with their parents, grow more in math over the course of first-grade than do students who use the math app less (and than students in the reading control group). Most interestingly, they found that the app is particularly helpful for students with high-math-anxious parents. By providing an engaging way for math anxious parents to share math with their children, the math app may help cut the link between parents’ high math anxiety and children’s low math achievement. The app may give parents – especially high-math-anxious parents who may have less math skill and interest in engaging in math – more and better ways to talk to their children about math not only during app usage, but also during  everyday interactions.
Keith Yoder, a fourth year graduate student under the supervision of Dr. Jean Decety, recently published a study that reports how individuals with psychopathy process morally relevant information.  Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterized by a lack of guilt, empathy, and remorse, callous disregard for others, as well as abnormal emotional processing. This study is part of a long-term collaboration between the Decety Lab and Kent Kiehl at Mind Institute, New Mexico. Recently, they showed prisoners scenarios depicting interpersonal harm or assistance, who were requested to make judgments about either the moral or non-moral (physical location) content of the social interaction. The results of the study, published in Translational Psychiatry, indicate that while psychopathy does not impact the accuracy of simple judgments, higher levels of psychopathic traits lead to a shift in network neural activity.  Specifically, inmates with low levels of psychopathy show enhanced neuronal coupling between regions involved in automatic aversive responses to interpersonal harm (e.g., posterior temporal sulcus, amygdala, anterior insula).  Individuals with higher trait psychopathy lack this response, and so must rely on regions such as anterior cingulate to correctly apply explicit rules to label interpersonal harm as morally wrong. This study was funded in part by an NIMH RO1 grant to Dr. Decety.
Based on Jean Decety's extensive work on empathy, doctoral student Kim Lewis and the Decety lab performed an EEG study aimed at dissociating specific components of empathy. They recruited and ran young adults through the study to examine the neural differences of empathic concern and affective sharing in response to viewing others in pain. The results of this study, published in the Journal of Neurophysiology, showed that these two empathy components were dissociable on a neurophysiological level. The study was funded by grants awarded to Dr. Decety from the John Templeton Foundation and NIH.
University of Chicago Learn Contact Give
5848 S. University Ave. | Chicago, IL 60637 US
powered by emma
Subscribe to our email list.