Up until 2013, Bristol-Myers Squibb stated in filings that its dividend-payment program “promotes greater retention of our executives.” But the drugmaker has since changed its policy and no longer pays dividends on unowned shares. In a 2014 filing, the company said its decision "simplifies employee communications and administration to further engage and retain employees."
Other firms that have quit the practice include Citigroup, GE and IBM. These companies often allow dividends on restricted shares to accrue but don’t pay them out until the stocks vest. If the shares don’t vest because performance wasn’t up to snuff or the executive didn’t stay in the job, typically those restricted stocks are forfeited, along with the dividends.
After years of pressure from shareholders and advocates such as Daley, more than half of S&P 500 companies have banned the practice. Institutional Shareholder Services, a powerful corporate-governance advisory firm, last year started taking into account dividend payments on unearned shares when deciding whether to recommend that investors vote in favor of a compensation plan.
“Prohibiting dividend payments on any type of unvested equity is definitely considered a market best practice,” said Sydney Carlock, a senior compensation analyst at the advisory firm.
Nonetheless, some companies continue to find that stealth dividend payments are a hard habit to quit. In 2016 JPMorgan began granting Dimon a type of restricted stock that doesn’t pay dividends before vesting, but several top executives at the bank are still paid dividends on unowned shares. Asset management chief Mary Callahan Erdoes received $613,000 this way that year, while $580,000 went to Daniel Pinto, head of corporate and investment banking, according to calculations by Crain’s based on data in the firm’s most recent pay-disclosure statement. The firm declined to comment.
Philip Morris International is also trying to wean its CEO off this type of dividends. Under a new plan, only 40% of the restricted shares granted to Calantzopoulos pay dividends before vesting, down from 100%, a spokesman said. The representative did add that the dividend-paying unvested shares "incentivize executive retention" and "align executive interest with that of the shareholders." Like most tobacco companies, Philip Morris’ dividends are quite generous, with the firm’s $6.5 billion 2017 payout exceeding its profits by about $200 million.
AllianceBernstein, which manages more than $550 billion in client assets, continues to pay its CEO dividends on unvested shares. Kraus left the firm last year, and the amount paid on the restricted stock granted to his successor, Seth Bernstein, wasn’t disclosed but would have been $165,000 based on the dividends issued after Bernstein’s tenure began.
Stealth dividend payments appear especially popular at financial and real estate investment firms. They have played an important role in how top people are paid at Greenhill & Co., a Wall Street firm that advises some of the world’s leading corporations on mergers and acquisitions. The firm’s stock price fell 3% in the five-year period beginning in 2011, a significantly worse performance than its peers’, but the payout to CEO Scott Bok for his pile of unvested shares rose 75%, to $580,000, in 2016. That gravy train has since slowed down: After the long stretch of disappointing performance, Greenhill slashed its dividend payments by 89% last year.
The company didn’t respond to a request for comment.