Case On Point
Curtin v. United Trademark Holdings, Inc.
(U.S. App. Ct. for the Fed. Cir. 2025)
United Trademark Holdings, a toy and doll manufacturer, filed a trademark registration application for the term "Rapunzel". Plaintiff, a doll collector, filed an opposition, claiming, among other things, that the term was generic, and would reduce the supply of dolls inspired by the famous fairy tale. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled that plaintiff did not have standing to challenge the registration because she could not allege any commercial injury. The Court of Appeals upheld this ruling, on the grounds that only parties falling within the "zone of interests" protected by the Lanham Act could file such an opposition. In an earlier decision, the Supreme Court held that “to come within the zone of interests . . . a plaintiff must allege an injury to a commercial interest in reputation or sales." As a consumer, Curtin did not meet the applicable criteria.