University of Utah logo with text below reading “Martha Bradley Evans Center for Teaching Excellence.” The background is black, and the logo is in red and white.
 

Newsletter August 6, 2026
cte.utah.edu

 
alt=
 

MBECTE’s Annual Teaching Symposium, 8/17

Flyer for the University of Utah Annual Teaching Symposium on August 17 from 9 AM–3 PM at Marriott Library, featuring workshops for higher education teaching, keynote speaker C. Thi Nguyen, and free registration with lunch provided.
Register here for ATS!
 

Required Pedagogy Training for Graduate Student Instructors of Record

Effective August 1, 2026, Revised Policy 6-100 requires that any educational trainees or graduate student who is the Instructor of Record for a course section should complete training or a course on teaching in higher education either before or concurrently with the teaching assignment or have comparable, prior experience in teaching in higher education. Training may be conducted by the academic unit or can be completed through the Martha Bradley Evans Center for Teaching Excellence, or through other means. 

For students who plan to complete the requirement through CTE, we recommend:

  • Attending our Graduate Teaching Institute next May
  • Taking CTLE 6000 Teaching in Higher Education during fall or spring semester. This course is part of CTE’s graduate certificate in Teaching in Higher Education. Courses may be taken as part of certificate or independently. 
  • Registering for and attending a special set of sessions at the Annual Teaching Symposium on August 17.
Register here for ATS!
Flyer for the Graduate Certificate in Teaching in Higher Education at the University of Utah. Lists required CTLE courses, certificate benefits, and a QR code for more information.
More Information Here!
 

University Policy 6-100 Changes Affecting Instruction

Dear Instructor,

I am writing to share important information regarding Policy 6-100: Instruction and Evaluation. Updates to this policy took effect on August 1, 2026.

Policy 6-100 is one of the University’s foundational academic policies, governing core aspects of instruction, grading, course delivery, and student academic standards. Over the past two years, the policy underwent a comprehensive review and revision process involving faculty, staff, administrators, and students. This included a cross-campus working group, extensive stakeholder consultation, town halls, and Academic Senate engagement.

The newly revised policy is designed to:

- Improve clarity, transparency, and consistency for both students and instructors

- Align policy with current institutional practices and external requirements

- Strengthen academic processes related to grading, attendance, and course delivery

- Support student success through clearer expectations and more consistent application across all courses

Importantly, these updates do not change academic freedom or faculty authority over course content but instead provide a clearer and more consistent framework for instructional practices. I encourage all faculty members to read through the full Revised Policy PDF in addition to the key updates highlighted below. You can also find more information and resources on Navigate U’s Policy 6-100 webpage.

Key Updates for Instructors:

Section III.C.1 Minimum Enrollment Thresholds and corresponding new Rule R6-100F

Establishes a department chair’s responsibility to cancel a course with fewer enrolled students than the minimum suggested enrollment threshold, unless the department chair determines an exception for the course. Rule R6-100F establishes recommended enrollment thresholds (lower division undergraduate course (1000-2000 level) is 20 students; upper division undergraduate course (3000-4000 level) is 15 students) and the process for canceling a course.

 

Section III.D Credit Bearing Courses

Establishes that a Course-Offering unit should ensure an educational trainee or other graduate student who is the instructor of record for a course section should complete training or a course on teaching in higher education if the instructor does not have prior experience in higher education.

 

Section III.F Attendance Expectations

Clarifies absences that instructors are required to excuse and absences that instructors have the discretion to determine whether to excuse. Provides resources for students who need assistance working with an instructor to excuse an absence. Please review G6-100: Accommodating Absences for Explicitly Listed and Other Compelling Reasons for additional guidance related to absences.

 

Section III.H.1 Final Examinations

Clarifies that instructors may determine the format of assessments given during the final exam periods and must administer final assessments at the time and location assigned by the Office of the Registrar. If an instructor chooses not to administer a final assessment during the final exam period, they must notify the Office of the Registrar to allow for rescheduling of the classroom.

 

Section III.I.1.c Instructor and Course-Offering Unit Responsibilities Related to Grading and Instruction

Establishes the grading responsibilities for instructors and requires instructors to take reasonable steps to ensure consistent grading across graders.

 

Section III.K.2 Transcript Notations for Grades Based on Academic Performance

Changes the date by which a student must select CR/NC to the deadline to withdraw from a course section.

CR/NC is reserved for when students elect to take a standard letter grade course for credit or no credit.  The instructor will input the letter grade earned and the system will convert the grade to either a CR or an NC based on the grade submitted.

 

Section III.K.3 Transcript Notations for Grades Based on Academic Performance

Creates the binary grading scale of Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory (S/U) to denote grades in courses where all students are graded on a binary scale for pedagogical reasons (as opposed to a student electing CR/NC). This will apply to all courses that generate one credit hour or less (unless a proposal is submitted via CourseDog by curriculum committee to have the course be standard letter grade). Variable credit courses that generate one credit or less (e.g. variable credit course that is 0.5-1) will be automatically converted to S/U grading basis. Variable credit courses that generate more than one credit will not be converted to S/U unless a request is submitted to have it be on the S/U grading basis. For any course on the S/U grading basis, the instructor will only be able to select S or U at the time of grading.

 

Section III.M.1 Temporary Grades

Reduces the time to resolve an Incomplete (I) grade from one year to 90 days, with flexibility for extensions in exceptional circumstances.

 

Section III.M.3 Temporary Grades

Creates the transcription notation of Not Reported (NR) to indicate that an instructor has not submitted a grade for a student who has attended or participated in a course section. This is to differentiate from an “Unofficial Withdraw” (EU), the transcription notation for a student who has not attended or participated in a course.

 

Section III.P.1 Withdrawing from Course Sections

Changes the withdrawal deadline to 75 percent of the way through the instructional period to ensure that students have more information to determine whether to withdraw.

 

Section Y Accommodations in Courses for Students’ Religious and Conscience Beliefs and corresponding Rule R6-100B

Incorporated into Rule R6-100B and revised to meet statutory obligations related to content accommodations for required examinations and assignments in required courses.

 

If you have questions about how these changes apply to your courses or instructional practices, please do not hesitate to contact the Martha Bradley Evans Center for Teaching Excellence.

T. Chase Hagood

Vice Provost for Student Success

Policy 6-100 Owner

 

New Student Course Feedback Instructor Summary Reports Available

This semester, Student Course Feedback introduces a new Instructor Report designed to complement the familiar Section Report.

You can access your reports by logging in to the Student Course Feedback portal, where you can also monitor survey response rates, review survey dates, and access other course evaluation tools.

→ Log in to Student Course Feedback

While a Section Report summarizes student feedback for a single course offering, the Instructor Report brings together feedback across your teaching over the past five years. It is designed to help you identify longer-term patterns, recognize recurring strengths, and support reflection on your teaching over time.

Section Report
Feedback for one course section.

Instructor Report
A five-year view across your teaching.

To help you get started, we've created a few short guides:

Reading the Instructor Report: Understand the sections, metrics, and trends included in your Instructor Report. 

Reading the Section Report: Learn how to interpret results for an individual course section. 

Whether you're preparing a teaching portfolio, reviewing feedback from a recent semester, or simply looking for a broader view of your teaching, these resources can help you get the most from your reports.

 

MBECTE Fall Workshop Series

Sept 10th
Sept 16th
Oct 8th
Oct 29th
 

MBECTE Durable Skills Faculty Development Series

Flyer listing nine Zoom workshops in the Durable Skills Faculty Development Series, held from September through April at 10 a.m.
Sept
9
Sept 17
Oct
22
Nov
19
Dec 
2
 

 Fall 2026 Syllabus Reminders 

A few reminders as you prep for your Fall 2026 course:

  • All syllabi must be posted by August 17
    • Both mandatory and non-mandatory course syllabi should be posted to the class schedule via CIS
    • Mandatory course syllabi should also be posted to Simple Syllabus
    • For syllabus requirements, mandatory institutional policies, and more, please see CTE’s Syllabus Design Page
  • Course Canvas pages help students locate and organize information about the course. Our top tips for your course Canvas page:
    • Use modules that organize the course chronologically
    • Post all course deadlines on the calendar
    • Create, publish, and use assignment rubrics 
    • Ensure all of your materials meet digital accessibility standards. For more information, see our Accessibility Essentials site. 
    • For more information about using Canvas or to get help, see Digital Learning Technologies’ Canvas help page. 
  • Help your students use AI responsibly. Share and review check out the AI & U Student Guide. This site has information about tools, necessary skills, acceptable use, and more. Please add this important resource to your Syllabus, your Canvas pages, and make sure to take some time to share it with your students. For more direct information about how to integrate AI into your pedagogy, you can check out CTE’s Teaching with AI page. 
 

Canvas Accessibility Community of Practice

Canvas Accessibility Community of Practice flyer.
Sign up here!
 

Upcoming Funding Deadlines

  • University Distinguished Teaching Awards - Due 9/18/26
  • University Teaching Grants - Due 9/30/26, 1/25/27, and 3/5/27
  • Calvin S. and JeNeal N. Hatch Prize in Teaching - Due 10/12/26
  • John R. Park Teaching Fellowships - Due 10/12/26
  • Community Engaged Teaching and Scholarship Award - Due 10/12/16
  • Early Career Teaching Awards - Due 12/4/26
 
 
 

295 S 1500 E | Salt Lake City , UT 84112 US

Manage your preferences | Opt Out
Got this as a forward? Sign up to receive our future emails.
View this email online.

This email was sent to kara.l.moore@utah.edu.
To continue receiving our emails, add us to your address book.